On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 09:26:25PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > I;m fairly certain is just aliasing... but I do understand a file cannot > be embedded. Would comment help here indicating no other fields should > be added to ttm_backup without struct file be converted to pointer or > that just to risky?
What exactly are you trying to do there? IOW, is that always supposed to be a struct file, or something dependent upon something in struct ttm_tt instance, or...? And what is the lifecycle of that thing? E.g. what is guaranteed about ttm_backup_fini() vs. functions accessing the damn thing? Are they serialized on something/tied to lifecycle stages of struct ttm_tt?
