On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 5:28 AM Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 01:54:10PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>
> >
> > In situations where mapping/unmapping squence can be controlled by
> > userspace, attempting to map over a region that has not yet been
> > unmapped is an error.  But not something that should spam dmesg.
>
> I think if you want to do something like that using the iommu API the
> expectation is for the caller to do a iova_to_phys to check what is
> mapped first? That seems kind of lame..
>
> Maybe page table driver should not not be doing these WARNs at all. If
> we want to check for that the core iommu code should have the WARN_ON?
>
> eg iommufd already has a WARN_ON around iommu_unmap failures so having
> one in the ARM page table is a double WARN.
>
> Don't really like using a quirk to change the API contract.

I'd also be ok to have the WARN_ON instead in the iommu code.  In the
case where this quirk is needed, I'm using the io_pgtable helpers
directly, not going via the iommu layer.

BR,
-R

Reply via email to