On 25.04.25 22:00, Peter Xu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:17:08AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's use the new, cleaner interface.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
  mm/memremap.c | 8 ++++----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
index 2aebc1b192da9..c417c843e9b1f 100644
--- a/mm/memremap.c
+++ b/mm/memremap.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void pageunmap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, int 
range_id)
        }
        mem_hotplug_done();
- untrack_pfn(NULL, PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range), true);
+       pfnmap_untrack(PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range));
        pgmap_array_delete(range);
  }
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static int pagemap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, struct mhp_params *params,
        if (nid < 0)
                nid = numa_mem_id();
- error = track_pfn_remap(NULL, &params->pgprot, PHYS_PFN(range->start), 0,
-                       range_len(range));
+       error = pfnmap_track(PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range),
+                            &params->pgprot);
        if (error)
                goto err_pfn_remap;
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pagemap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, struct mhp_params *params,
        if (!is_private)
                kasan_remove_zero_shadow(__va(range->start), range_len(range));
  err_kasan:
-       untrack_pfn(NULL, PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range), true);
+       pfnmap_untrack(PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range));

Not a huge deal, but maybe we could merge this and previous patch?  It
might be easier to reference the impl when reading the call site changes.

Yes, I can do that. The important part to me is to split #5 of, to keep that patch somewhat reasonable in size.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to