On 25.04.25 22:00, Peter Xu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:17:08AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's use the new, cleaner interface.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
mm/memremap.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
index 2aebc1b192da9..c417c843e9b1f 100644
--- a/mm/memremap.c
+++ b/mm/memremap.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void pageunmap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, int
range_id)
}
mem_hotplug_done();
- untrack_pfn(NULL, PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range), true);
+ pfnmap_untrack(PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range));
pgmap_array_delete(range);
}
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static int pagemap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, struct mhp_params *params,
if (nid < 0)
nid = numa_mem_id();
- error = track_pfn_remap(NULL, ¶ms->pgprot, PHYS_PFN(range->start), 0,
- range_len(range));
+ error = pfnmap_track(PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range),
+ ¶ms->pgprot);
if (error)
goto err_pfn_remap;
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pagemap_range(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, struct mhp_params *params,
if (!is_private)
kasan_remove_zero_shadow(__va(range->start), range_len(range));
err_kasan:
- untrack_pfn(NULL, PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range), true);
+ pfnmap_untrack(PHYS_PFN(range->start), range_len(range));
Not a huge deal, but maybe we could merge this and previous patch? It
might be easier to reference the impl when reading the call site changes.
Yes, I can do that. The important part to me is to split #5 of, to keep
that patch somewhat reasonable in size.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb