On 4/25/2025 3:36 AM, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote:
From: Karol Wachowski <karol.wachow...@intel.com>

The mutex unlock for vdev->submitted_jobs_lock was incorrectly placed
after unlocking file_priv->lock. Change order of unlocks to avoid potential

This should read "before unlocking", right?

race conditions.

Fixes: 5bbccadaf33e ("accel/ivpu: Abort all jobs after command queue 
unregister")
Signed-off-by: Karol Wachowski <karol.wachow...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynow...@linux.intel.com>
---
  drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
index 863e3cd6ace51..540923ffcbf8d 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
@@ -681,8 +681,8 @@ static int ivpu_job_submit(struct ivpu_job *job, u8 
priority, u32 cmdq_id)
  err_erase_xa:
        xa_erase(&vdev->submitted_jobs_xa, job->job_id);
  err_unlock:
-       mutex_unlock(&vdev->submitted_jobs_lock);
        mutex_unlock(&file_priv->lock);
+       mutex_unlock(&vdev->submitted_jobs_lock);
        ivpu_rpm_put(vdev);
        return ret;
  }

Reply via email to