On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:48:31AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > The i915_oa_stream_destroy() function directly accesses the
> > ratelimit_state structure's ->missed field, which work, but which also
> > makes it more difficult to change this field.  Therefore, make use of
> > the ratelimit_state_get_miss() function instead of directly accessing
> > the ->missed field.
> 
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>

Thank you, Jani!  I will apply this on my next rebase later today.

> For merging via whichever tree is convenient for you. Please let us know
> if you want us to pick it up via drm-intel.

This one depends on a commit earlier in the series, so I will very
happily take you up on your kind offer of letting me push it.  ;-)

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> > Link: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbe93a52-365e-47fe-93a4-44a44547d601@paulmck-laptop/
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250423115409.3425-1-spassw...@web.de/
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursu...@ursulin.net>
> > Cc: David Airlie <airl...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Simona Vetter <sim...@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: <intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org>
> > Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > index de0b413600a15..1658f1246c6fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > @@ -1666,6 +1666,7 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct 
> > i915_perf_stream *stream)
> >     struct i915_perf *perf = stream->perf;
> >     struct intel_gt *gt = stream->engine->gt;
> >     struct i915_perf_group *g = stream->engine->oa_group;
> > +   int m;
> >  
> >     if (WARN_ON(stream != g->exclusive_stream))
> >             return;
> > @@ -1690,10 +1691,9 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct 
> > i915_perf_stream *stream)
> >     free_oa_configs(stream);
> >     free_noa_wait(stream);
> >  
> > -   if (perf->spurious_report_rs.missed) {
> > -           gt_notice(gt, "%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to 
> > ratelimiting\n",
> > -                     perf->spurious_report_rs.missed);
> > -   }
> > +   m = ratelimit_state_get_miss(&perf->spurious_report_rs);
> > +   if (m)
> > +           gt_notice(gt, "%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to 
> > ratelimiting\n", m);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void gen7_init_oa_buffer(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to