Hi Matthew, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-xe/drm-xe-next] [also build test ERROR on next-20250424] [cannot apply to drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next linus/master drm/drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm-tip/drm-tip v6.15-rc3] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Auld/drm-gpusvm-fix-hmm_pfn_to_map_order-usage/20250424-202128 base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel.git drm-xe-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250424121827.862729-15-matthew.auld%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/xe/userptr: replace xe_hmm with gpusvm config: loongarch-randconfig-002-20250424 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250424/202504242203.mfhcd5la-...@intel.com/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.4.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250424/202504242203.mfhcd5la-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504242203.mfhcd5la-...@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/irqflags.h:19, from include/linux/spinlock.h:59, from include/linux/sched.h:2213, from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6, from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16, from include/linux/device.h:15, from include/drm/drm_print.h:31, from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_assert.h:11, from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h:9, from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:6: arch/loongarch/include/asm/percpu.h:20:4: error: #error compiler support for the model attribute is necessary when a recent assembler is used 20 | # error compiler support for the model attribute is necessary when a recent assembler is used | ^~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c: In function 'xe_vma_userptr_force_invalidate': >> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:699:52: error: 'struct xe_userptr' has no member >> named 'notifier_seq'; did you mean 'notifier'? 699 | uvma->userptr.notifier_seq)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ | notifier drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:700:31: error: 'struct xe_userptr' has no member named 'notifier_seq'; did you mean 'notifier'? 700 | uvma->userptr.notifier_seq -= 2; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ | notifier Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for DRM_GPUSVM Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && DRM [=y] && DEVICE_PRIVATE [=n] Selected by [m]: - DRM_XE [=m] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && DRM [=y] && PCI [=y] && MMU [=y] && (m [=m] && MODULES [=y] || KUNIT [=n]=y [=y]) vim +699 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c dd08ebf6c3525a Matthew Brost 2023-03-30 676 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 677 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_USERPTR_INVAL_INJECT) 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 678 /** 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 679 * xe_vma_userptr_force_invalidate() - force invalidate a userptr 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 680 * @uvma: The userptr vma to invalidate 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 681 * 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 682 * Perform a forced userptr invalidation for testing purposes. 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 683 */ 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 684 void xe_vma_userptr_force_invalidate(struct xe_userptr_vma *uvma) 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 685 { 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 686 struct xe_vm *vm = xe_vma_vm(&uvma->vma); 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 687 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 688 /* Protect against concurrent userptr pinning */ 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 689 lockdep_assert_held(&vm->lock); 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 690 /* Protect against concurrent notifiers */ a2cfe1a4a9e967 Matthew Auld 2025-04-24 691 lockdep_assert_held(&vm->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock); 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 692 /* 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 693 * Protect against concurrent instances of this function and 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 694 * the critical exec sections 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 695 */ 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 696 xe_vm_assert_held(vm); 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 697 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 698 if (!mmu_interval_read_retry(&uvma->userptr.notifier, 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 @699 uvma->userptr.notifier_seq)) 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 700 uvma->userptr.notifier_seq -= 2; 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 701 __vma_userptr_invalidate(vm, uvma); 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 702 } 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 703 #endif 100a5b8dadfca5 Thomas Hellström 2025-02-28 704 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
