Hello, > The mtd_master is completely different class to avoid mtd tree disturbances. > It is real kernel device object, I'm not sure how we can do 'link to' > magic here.
Maybe we can add that later if someone needs. > About MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER - we can treat it as another partition and > create master device plus whole device partition as it's child with all other > partitions as children of master device. > For unpartitioned device this mean that we create master device and partition > regardless of MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER flag. I am not sure I follow you. I am proposing to create the mtd_master device in all cases. I believe this is the future-proof approach. Can you make this change? Regarding the hierarchy, I indeed agree with what you propose: mtd_master parent of whole partition device (if any) parent of partitions. Thanks, Miquèl
