On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 08:08:17AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 09/04/2025 17:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On 09/04/2025 09:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 08/04/2025 22:26, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>>>>>>>> + - const: qcom,sa8775p-dsi-ctrl > >>>>>>>>> + - const: qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Drop fallback > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I couldn't understand the meaning of "Drop fallback", could please > >>>>>>> elaborate it ? > >>>>>> Look at SM8750 example on the lists. Keep only front compatible. > >>>>> > >>>>> Why? > >>>> > >>>> To make things simpler and shorter. > >>> > >>> I'd prefer consistency. Previous platforms use qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl. > >> Then you should have objected month(s) ago when Rob asked for dropping > >> fallback and since then we consistently drop it. > > > > Well... It's still not merged. is it? > > For SM8750 it kinda makes sense, because the clock handling is different > > from all other current platforms. For the existing devices... I'm not > > that sure. > How does it differ? The clock handling does not matter - this is just > select of schema for the child node.
Ah.... I'm sorry, I misinterpreted the email. Yes, having only a single compat here is perfectly fine. Please excuse me for the confusion. -- With best wishes Dmitry
