On Tue 2025-04-08 12:38:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:52:10AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote: > > > On 8 Apr 2025, at 2:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:17:13PM +0530, Aditya Garg wrote: > > >> The vsprint patch was originally being sent as a seperate patch [1], and > > >> I was waiting it to be taken up. But as suggested by Petr, I'm sending > > >> them via DRM. > > > > > > You need to do something about your tools, really. > > > > Uhh, I'll just revert to the tried and tested macOS mail. > > > > Although I don't think a resend is necessary here now. > > I dunno. If people are using `b4`, it might mess up the patch ordering, > I haven't checked this myself (it depends if it takes [PATCH x/y] or message > threading into account first).
JFYI, it seems that b4 handles this correctly. AFAIK, it checks the [PATCH x/y] in subjects. But I am not sure what DRM guys are using. I guess that they are using patchwork. I am not sure how it handles this... Best Regards, Petr
