Oh, sorry, I've picked it up now. Thanks! Alex
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 4:16 AM Denis Arefev <are...@swemel.ru> wrote: > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c > > index 189c6a32b6bd..54229b991858 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c > > @@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ int smu_v11_0_set_fan_speed_rpm(struct smu_context > > *smu, > > uint32_t crystal_clock_freq = 2500; > > uint32_t tach_period; > > > > - if (speed == 0) > > + if (!speed || speed > UINT_MAX/8) > > return -EINVAL; > > /* > > * To prevent from possible overheat, some ASICs may have > > requirement > > -- > > 2.43.0 > > > > Hi Alex. > > The patch 'drm/amd/pm/smu11: Prevent division by zero' was sent > separately, not part of the patch series, maybe that's why it wasn't > accepted. Should I resend it? > > Regards, Denis. >