On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jerome Glisse <j.glisse at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround
>> added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11
>> (drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).
>>
>> Fixes:
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
>> Cc: stable at kernel.org
>> ---
>> ?drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | ? ?6 +++++-
>> ?1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>> index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>> ?#include "atom.h"
>> ?#include "atom-names.h"
>> ?#include "atom-bits.h"
>> +#include "radeon.h"
>>
>> ?#define ATOM_COND_ABOVE ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0
>> ?#define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL 1
>> @@ -101,7 +102,9 @@ static void debug_print_spaces(int n)
>> ?static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? uint32_t index, uint32_t data)
>> ?{
>> + ? ? ? struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private;
>> ? ? ? ?uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD;
>> +
>> ? ? ? ?while (1)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?switch (CU8(base)) {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?case ATOM_IIO_NOP:
>> @@ -112,7 +115,8 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context 
>> *ctx, int base,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?base += 3;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 
>> 1));
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, 
>> CU16(base + 1));
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), 
>> temp);
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?base += 3;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
>> --
>> 1.7.1.1
>>
>
>
> So this patch enable io write only for one family ? This looks utterly 
> strange.

No, it just does a read before write for rv515.  I don't know why it
needs it, but it seems to.

Alex

>
> Cheers,
> Jerome
>

Reply via email to