On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 03:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/03/2025 13:10, Ayushi Makhija wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >
> >> +
> >> + anx_bridge_1: anx7625@58 {
> >
> > Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
> > examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
> > https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
> >
> > In this I have changed the node name as anx_bridge1 : anx7625@58.
>
> Except that it is difficult to understand what is what, let's recap.
>
> Original code was:
> anx_bridge_1: anx7625@58 {
>
> You said you changed it to:
>
> anx_bridge1 : anx7625@58.
>
> and now I give my offer: I offer to buy a beer (or tee/coffee/juice) to
> anyone who will spot the difference(s) between these two node names,
> IOW, tell me what changed here.
Ayushi: mediatek DT are a bad example here. Please use bridge@58 as node
name.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
