The i915_oa_stream_destroy() function directly accesses the
ratelimit_state structure's ->missed field, which work, but which also
makes it more difficult to change this field.  Therefore, make use of
the ratelimit_state_get_miss() function instead of directly accessing
the ->missed field.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursu...@ursulin.net>
Cc: David Airlie <airl...@gmail.com>
Cc: Simona Vetter <sim...@ffwll.ch>
Cc: <intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index 5384d1bb49233..a1ffb45a413b0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -1663,6 +1663,7 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct 
i915_perf_stream *stream)
        struct i915_perf *perf = stream->perf;
        struct intel_gt *gt = stream->engine->gt;
        struct i915_perf_group *g = stream->engine->oa_group;
+       int m;
 
        if (WARN_ON(stream != g->exclusive_stream))
                return;
@@ -1687,10 +1688,9 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct 
i915_perf_stream *stream)
        free_oa_configs(stream);
        free_noa_wait(stream);
 
-       if (perf->spurious_report_rs.missed) {
-               gt_notice(gt, "%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to 
ratelimiting\n",
-                         perf->spurious_report_rs.missed);
-       }
+       m = ratelimit_state_get_miss(&perf->spurious_report_rs);
+       if (m)
+               gt_notice(gt, "%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to 
ratelimiting\n", m);
 }
 
 static void gen7_init_oa_buffer(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
-- 
2.40.1

Reply via email to