Am 21.03.25 um 19:05 schrieb Philipp Stanner:
> On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:58 +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Sometimes drivers need to be able to submit multiple jobs which
>> depend on
>> each other to different schedulers at the same time, but using
>> drm_sched_job_add_dependency() can't fail any more after the first
>> job is
>> initialized.
>>
>> This function preallocate memory for dependency slots so that no
>> ENOMEM
>> can come later while adding dependencies.
>>
>> v2: rework implementation an documentation
> For drm/sched Danilo & I think that changelogs shouldn't be in the
> commit message anymore. The Link: applied by the DRM tools will be
> sufficient to find the history in the archives if necessary.

Sure, going to drop that.

>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 44
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h            |  2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>> index 4d4219fbe49d..ee3701f346b2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>> @@ -852,6 +852,39 @@ void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job
>> *job)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_arm);
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * drm_sched_job_prealloc_dependency_slots - avoid ENOMEM on adding
>> dependencies
>> + * @job: scheduler job where dependencies will be added
>> + * @num_deps: number of dependencies to preallocate slots for
>> +  *
>> + * Sometimes drivers need to be able to submit multiple jobs which
>> depend on
>> + * each other to different schedulers at the same time, but using
>> + * drm_sched_job_add_dependency() can't fail any more after the
>> first job is
>> + * initialized.
>> + *
>> + * This function preallocate memory for dependency slots so that no
>> ENOMEM can
>> + * come later while adding dependencies.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * 0 on success, or an error on failing to expand the array.
>> + */
>> +int drm_sched_job_prealloc_dependency_slots(struct drm_sched_job
>> *job,
>> +                                        unsigned int num_deps)
>> +{
>> +    u32 id = 0;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    while (num_deps--) {
>> +            ret = xa_alloc(&job->dependencies, &id,
>> XA_ZERO_ENTRY,
>> +                           xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL);
> Fine by me, but out of curiousity about the xarray: you mentioned
> xa_reserve() might work, too?

Different use case, xa_reserve() can only reserve a specific index and not 
allocate one.

Allocating and reserving at the same time seems to be done by the pattern 
xa_alloc(...XA_ZERO_ENTRY...) like we use here.

Regards,
Christian.

>
>
> P.
>
>> +            if (ret != 0)
>> +                    return ret;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_prealloc_dependency_slots);
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * drm_sched_job_add_dependency - adds the fence as a job dependency
>>   * @job: scheduler job to add the dependencies to
>> @@ -878,10 +911,15 @@ int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct
>> drm_sched_job *job,
>>       * engines involved, rather than the number of BOs.
>>       */
>>      xa_for_each(&job->dependencies, index, entry) {
>> -            if (entry->context != fence->context)
>> +            if (xa_is_zero(entry)) {
>> +                    /*
>> +                     * Reserved entries must not alloc memory,
>> but let's
>> +                     * use GFP_ATOMIC just to be on the
>> defensive side.
>> +                    */
>> +                    xa_store(&job->dependencies, index, fence,
>> GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +            } else if (entry->context != fence->context) {
>>                      continue;
>> -
>> -            if (dma_fence_is_later(fence, entry)) {
>> +            } else if (dma_fence_is_later(fence, entry)) {
>>                      dma_fence_put(entry);
>>                      xa_store(&job->dependencies, index, fence,
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>              } else {
>> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>> b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>> index 1a7e377d4cbb..916e820b27ff 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>> @@ -632,6 +632,8 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>                     u32 credits, void *owner);
>>  void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job *job);
>>  void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job);
>> +int drm_sched_job_prealloc_dependency_slots(struct drm_sched_job
>> *job,
>> +                                        unsigned int num_deps);
>>  int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>                               struct dma_fence *fence);
>>  int drm_sched_job_add_syncobj_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,

Reply via email to