On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 04:32:10PM +0800, Hermes Wu wrote:
> The DP link training work include auto training and after
> auto training failed "auto_train_retry" times, it switch to
> step training mode.
> 
> It will more efficiency that finish link auto training,
> include retry, and step training in a work, rather than
> re-schedule train work when each training fail.
> 
> it6505_dump() is remove from link trainig work, it takes too much
> time to read all register area, and is not necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hermes Wu <hermes...@ite.com.tw>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> index 
> dc1179c8338e27866f6adda4ef8fb2950336221b..11231a642bbe185c4f36bf5f2a0b115fa056213b
>  100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static int it6505_get_dpcd(struct it6505 *it6505, int 
> offset, u8 *dpcd, int num)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void it6505_dump(struct it6505 *it6505)
> +static void __maybe_unused it6505_dump(struct it6505 *it6505)
>  {
>       unsigned int i, j;
>       u8 regs[16];
> @@ -2472,7 +2472,7 @@ static void it6505_link_training_work(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>  {
>       struct it6505 *it6505 = container_of(work, struct it6505, link_works);
>       struct device *dev = it6505->dev;
> -     int ret;
> +     int ret, retry;
>  
>       DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "it6505->sink_count: %d",
>                            it6505->sink_count);
> @@ -2480,26 +2480,23 @@ static void it6505_link_training_work(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>       if (!it6505_get_sink_hpd_status(it6505))
>               return;
>  
> -     it6505_link_training_setup(it6505);
> -     it6505_reset_hdcp(it6505);
> -     it6505_aux_reset(it6505);
> -
> -     if (it6505->auto_train_retry < 1) {
> -             it6505_link_step_train_process(it6505);
> -             return;
> -     }
> +     retry = it6505->auto_train_retry;

Should you also drop auto_train_retry from the structure and assign
AUTO_TRAIN_RETRY here instead?

> +     do {
> +             it6505_link_training_setup(it6505);
> +             it6505_reset_hdcp(it6505);
> +             it6505_aux_reset(it6505);
>  
> -     ret = it6505_link_start_auto_train(it6505);
> -     DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "auto train %s, auto_train_retry: %d",
> +             ret = it6505_link_start_auto_train(it6505);
> +             DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "auto train %s, auto_train_retry: %d",
>                            ret ? "pass" : "failed", it6505->auto_train_retry);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     it6505_link_train_ok(it6505);
> +                     return;
> +             }
> +     } while (retry--);
>  
> -     if (ret) {
> -             it6505->auto_train_retry = AUTO_TRAIN_RETRY;
> -             it6505_link_train_ok(it6505);
> -     } else {
> -             it6505->auto_train_retry--;
> -             it6505_dump(it6505);
> -     }
> +     /*After HW auto training fail, try link training step by step*/
> +     it6505_link_step_train_process(it6505);
>  
>  }
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to