On 19/03/2025 at 07:32, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025, Yury Norov <yury.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:48:51AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Now that include/linux/bits.h implements fixed-width GENMASK_U*(), use
>>> them to implement the i915/xe specific macros. Converting each driver
>>> to use the generic macros are left for later, when/if other
>>> driver-specific macros are also generalized.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
>>> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vinc...@wanadoo.fr>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>>
>>> v5 -> v6:
>>>
>>> - No changes.
>>>
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>>
>>> - Add braket to macro names in patch description,
>>> e.g. 'REG_GENMASK*' -> 'REG_GENMASK*()'
>>>
>>> v3 -> v4:
>>>
>>> - Remove the prefixes in macro parameters,
>>> e.g. 'REG_GENMASK(__high, __low)' -> 'REG_GENMASK(high, low)'
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg_defs.h | 108
>>> ++++-------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg_defs.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg_defs.h
>>> index
>>> e251bcc0c89f5710125bc70f07851b2cb978c89c..39e5ed9511174b8757b9201bff735fa362651b34
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg_defs.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg_defs.h
>>> @@ -9,76 +9,19 @@
>>> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>>> #include <linux/bits.h>
>>>
>>> -/**
>>> - * REG_BIT() - Prepare a u32 bit value
>>> - * @__n: 0-based bit number
>>> - *
>>> - * Local wrapper for BIT() to force u32, with compile time checks.
>>> - *
>>> - * @return: Value with bit @__n set.
>>> +/*
>>> + * Wrappers over the generic BIT_* and GENMASK_* implementations,
>>> + * for compatibility reasons with previous implementation
>>> */
>>> -#define REG_BIT(__n)
>>> \
>>> - ((u32)(BIT(__n) + \
>>> - BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__is_constexpr(__n) && \
>>> - ((__n) < 0 || (__n) > 31))))
>>> +#define REG_GENMASK(high, low) GENMASK_U32(high, low)
>>> +#define REG_GENMASK64(high, low) GENMASK_U64(high, low)
>>> +#define REG_GENMASK16(high, low) GENMASK_U16(high, low)
>>> +#define REG_GENMASK8(high, low) GENMASK_U8(high, low)
>>
>> Nit. Maybe just
>>
>> #define REG_GENMASK GENMASK_U32
>
> Please just keep it as it is for clarity.
I also prefer when the argument is clearly displayed. It shows at first
glance that this is a function-like macro and reminds of the correct
order of the argument without having to look at the definitions in
bits.h. It also allows for people to grep "#define REG_GENMASK(" in
order to find the macro definition.
To be honest, I don't have a strong opinion either, but because Jani
also prefers it this way, I will keep as-is.
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
