On 11/03/2025 07:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 01:10:26PM +0000, Matt Coster wrote:
>> Unlike AXE-1-16M, BXS-4-64 uses two power domains.
>>
>> Like the existing AXE-1-16M integration, BXS-4-64 uses the single clock
>> integration in the TI k3-j721s2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Coster <matt.cos...@imgtec.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Include adding the second power domain so it's in context
>> - Remove unnecessary example
>> - Link to v2: 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241118-sets-bxs-4-64-patch-v1-v2-8-3fd45d9fb...@imgtec.com
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Use normal reg syntax for 64-bit values
>> - Link to v1: 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241105-sets-bxs-4-64-patch-v1-v1-8-4ed30e865...@imgtec.com
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml | 34 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
>> index 
>> 5c16b2881447c9cda78e5bb46569e2f675d740c4..d9409d33154d429019776ddbf9d123b33f8c9740
>>  100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml
>> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ properties:
>>                - ti,am62-gpu
>>            - const: img,img-axe-1-16m
>>            - const: img,img-rogue
>> +      - items:
>> +          - enum:
>> +              - ti,j721s2-gpu
>> +          - const: img,img-bxs-4-64
>> +          - const: img,img-rogue
>>  
>>        # This legacy combination of compatible strings was introduced early 
>> on
>>        # before the more specific GPU identifiers were used.
>> @@ -49,6 +54,7 @@ properties:
>>    power-domain-names:
>>      items:
>>        - const: a
>> +      - const: b
> 
> No, you just affected old device claiming it has two items. What's more,
> it's not synced with power-domains. Both properties must have the same
> constraints, but above power domains have "anything".

My mistake. This is tied to to my misunderstanding below.

> 
>>  
>>    dma-coherent: true
>>  
>> @@ -74,12 +80,38 @@ allOf:
>>          - power-domains
>>          - power-domain-names
>>  
>> +  # Cores with one power domain
> 
> Drop

Ack

> 
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            const: img,img-axe-1-16m
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        power-domain-names:
>> +          minItems: 1
> 
> Drop

Ack

> 
>> +          maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  # Cores with two power domains
> 
> Drop

Ack

> 
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            const: img,img-bxs-4-64
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        power-domain-names:
>> +          minItems: 2
>> +          maxItems: 2
> 
> Missing constraints for power-domains.

My mistake, I misunderstood your comment on the V2 series as meaning
replace power-domains, not add to.

Thank you for taking the time to look through these patches again!

Cheers,
Matt

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 


-- 
Matt Coster
E: matt.cos...@imgtec.com

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to