Hi,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 6:05 AM <neil.armstr...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 06/03/2025 14:43, Tejas Vipin wrote:
> > Changes the novatek-nt36523 panel to use multi style functions for
> > improved error handling.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipi...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36523.c | 1683 ++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 823 insertions(+), 860 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36523.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36523.c
> > index 04f1d2676c78..922a225f6258 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36523.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36523.c
> > @@ -23,10 +23,12 @@
> >
> > #define DSI_NUM_MIN 1
> >
> > -#define mipi_dsi_dual_dcs_write_seq(dsi0, dsi1, cmd, seq...) \
> > - do { \
> > - mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi0, cmd, seq); \
> > - mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi1, cmd, seq); \
> > +#define mipi_dsi_dual_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx0, dsi_ctx1, cmd, seq...)
> > \
> > + do {
> > \
> > + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx0, cmd, seq);
> > \
> > + dsi_ctx1.accum_err = dsi_ctx0.accum_err;
> > \
> > + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx1, cmd, seq);
> > \
> > + dsi_ctx0.accum_err = dsi_ctx1.accum_err;
> > \
>
> Just thinking out loud, but can't we do :
>
> struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = NULL };
>
> #define mipi_dsi_dual_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, dsi0, dsi1, cmd, seq...)
> \
> do {
> dsi_ctx.dsi = dsi0;
> \
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, cmd, seq);
> \
> dsi_ctx.dsi = dsi1;
> \
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, cmd, seq);
> \
>
> ?
>
> So we have a single accum_err.
Even though the code you used was what I suggested in IRC, I like
Neil's suggestion better here. What do you think?
Other than that, it looks good to me.
-Doug
