On 2/28/25 10:58 AM, Alexander Stein wrote:

Hi,

  drivers/reset/reset-simple.c | 8 ++++++++
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-simple.c b/drivers/reset/reset-simple.c
index 2760678398308..1415a941fd6eb 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/reset-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/reset-simple.c
@@ -133,9 +133,17 @@ static const struct reset_simple_devdata 
reset_simple_active_low = {
        .status_active_low = true,
  };
+static const struct reset_simple_devdata reset_simple_fsl_imx95_gpu_blk_ctrl = {
+       .reg_offset = 0x8,

Shouldn't you add ".nr_resets = 1"? Otherwise this will have 8 resets
(resource_size(res) * BITS_PER_BYTE).

I should, thanks.

On a side note: RM says this is a write-once register. Do we consider writing
this register again?
BTW: Would it be possible to disable it completely (until reset) by writing 1?
My observation is that this register is set and cannot be cleared by writing 0 into it, if I write 0 into this register and read it back, it stays at 1 .

Maybe NXP can clarify whether modelling this as reset-simple is really a good idea or whether it would be better to rewrite this as custom reset driver ?

[...]

Reply via email to