On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 05:48:10PM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:24:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 12:05:37PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > When releasing a device, if the release action causes a group to be > > > released, a warning is emitted because it can't find the group. This > > > happens because devres_release_all() moves the entire list to a todo > > > list and also move the group markers. Considering r* normal resource > > > nodes and g1 a group resource node: > > > > > > g1 -----------. > > > v v > > > r1 -> r2 -> g1[0] -> r3-> g[1] -> r4 > > > > > > After devres_release_all(), dev->devres_head becomes empty and the todo > > > list it iterates on becomes: > > > > > > g1 > > > v > > > r1 -> r2 -> r3-> r4 -> g1[0] > > > > > > When a call to component_del() is made and takes down the aggregate > > > device, a warning like this happen: > > > > > > RIP: 0010:devres_release_group+0x362/0x530 > > > ... > > > Call Trace: > > > <TASK> > > > component_unbind+0x156/0x380 > > > component_unbind_all+0x1d0/0x270 > > > mei_component_master_unbind+0x28/0x80 [mei_hdcp] > > > take_down_aggregate_device+0xc1/0x160 > > > component_del+0x1c6/0x3e0 > > > intel_hdcp_component_fini+0xf1/0x170 [xe] > > > xe_display_fini+0x1e/0x40 [xe] > > > > > > Because the devres group corresponding to the hdcp component cannot be > > > found. Just ignore this corner case: if the dev->devres_head is empty > > > and the caller is trying to remove a group, it's likely in the process > > > of device cleanup so just ignore it instead of warning. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> > > > --- > > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > Thanks. Is it ok to take these 3 through the drm tree or are you taking > it through yours?
As the drm patches depened on these, I figured they should all go through the drm tree, so please feel free to take them. thanks, greg k-h
