On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 09:33:54AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.02.25 06:00, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:37:45 +0100 David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > The single "real" user in the tree of make_device_exclusive_range() always
> > > requests making only a single address exclusive. The current 
> > > implementation
> > > is hard to fix for properly supporting anonymous THP / large folios and
> > > for avoiding messing with rmap walks in weird ways.
> > > 
> > > So let's always process a single address/page and return folio + page to
> > > minimize page -> folio lookups. This is a preparation for further
> > > changes.
> > > 
> > > Reject any non-anonymous or hugetlb folios early, directly after GUP.
> > > 
> > > While at it, extend the documentation of make_device_exclusive() to
> > > clarify some things.
> > 
> > x86_64 allmodconfig:
> > 
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c: In function 
> > 'nouveau_atomic_range_fault':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c:612:68: error: 'folio' undeclared 
> > (first use in this function)
> >    612 |                 page = make_device_exclusive(mm, start, drm->dev, 
> > &folio);
> >        |                                                                    
> > ^~~~~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c:612:68: note: each undeclared 
> > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> Ah! Because I was carrying on the same branch SVM fixes [1] that are
> getting surprisingly little attention so far.

I believe this has been picked up in drm-misc-fixes now:

https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/Z69eloo_7LM6NneO@cassiopeiae/

> 
> 
> The following sorts it out for now:
> 
> From 337c68bf24af59f36477be11ea6ef7c7ce9aa8ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:33:04 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] merge
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index 39e3740980bb7..1fed638b9eba8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -590,6 +590,7 @@ static int nouveau_atomic_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm 
> *svmm,
>       unsigned long timeout =
>               jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT);
>       struct mm_struct *mm = svmm->notifier.mm;
> +     struct folio *folio;
>       struct page *page;
>       unsigned long start = args->p.addr;
>       unsigned long notifier_seq;
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 
> 
> I'll resend [1] once this stuff here landed.
> 
> Let me know if you want a full resend of this series, thanks.
> 
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250124181524.3584236-1-da...@redhat.com
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> David / dhildenb
> 

Reply via email to