On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:13:03PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> On Friday, 14 February 2025 07:06:20 CST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:28:00PM +0000, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > > This allows ntsync to be usuable by non-root processes out of the box
> > 
> > Are you sure you need/want that?  If so, why?  How did existing testing
> > not ever catch this?
> 
> Hi, sorry, this is of course my fault.
> 
> We do need /dev/ntsync to be openable from user space for it to be useful. 
> I'm not sure what the most "correct" permissions are to have in this case 
> (when we don't specifically need read or write), but I don't think I see a 
> reason not to just set to 666 or 444.
> 
> I originally assumed that the right way to do this was not to set the mode on 
> the kernel file but rather through udev; I believe I was using the code for 
> /dev/loop-control or /dev/fuse as an example, which both do that. So I (and 
> others who tested) had just manually set up udev rules for this, with the 
> eventual intent of adding a default rule to systemd like the others. I only 
> recently realized that doing something like this patch is possible and 
> precedented.
> 
> I don't know what the best way to address this is, but this is certainly the 
> simplest.
> 
> 

Ok, makes sense, can you give an acked-by or reviewed-by and I'll be
glad to queue it up and get it merged.

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to