Hi, Just a gentle follow-up on this patch. It has been reviewed by Bagas Sanjaya but hasn't been applied yet.
Regards, Pranav Tyagi On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 8:36 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:23:25PM +0530, Pranav Tyagi wrote: > > Corrects the following grammatical issues in the VGA Arbiter > documentation: > > - Fixes subject-verb agreement by changing "co-exists" to "co-exist" > > - Corrects pluralization by changing "server" to "servers" > > - Improves sentence structure for clarity > > > > +Cc: DRM folks. > > > Signed-off-by: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyag...@gmail.com> > > --- > > Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst > b/Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst > > index bde3c0afb059..d1e953712cc2 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst > > @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ Section 7, Legacy Devices. > > > > The Resource Access Control (RAC) module inside the X server [0] > existed for > > the legacy VGA arbitration task (besides other bus management tasks) > when more > > -than one legacy device co-exists on the same machine. But the problem > happens > > +than one legacy device co-exist on the same machine. But the problem > happens > > when these devices are trying to be accessed by different userspace > clients > > -(e.g. two server in parallel). Their address assignments conflict. > Moreover, > > +(e.g. two servers in parallel). Their address assignments conflict. > Moreover, > > ideally, being a userspace application, it is not the role of the X > server to > > control bus resources. Therefore an arbitration scheme outside of the X > server > > is needed to control the sharing of these resources. This document > introduces > > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ In-kernel interface > > libpciaccess > > ------------ > > > > -To use the vga arbiter char device it was implemented an API inside the > > +To use the vga arbiter char device, an API was implemented inside the > > libpciaccess library. One field was added to struct pci_device (each > device > > on the system):: > > > > The diff looks OK. > > Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdo...@gmail.com> > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara >
