On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.ka...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Ingyu, > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c >> index d60a6ca0cae5..8d22d8f2243d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c >> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static struct intel_context >> *gen8_ggtt_bind_get_ce(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt, intel >> * doing rpm_resume(). >> */ >> *wakeref = intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(gt); >> - if (!*wakeref) >> + if (!*wakeref || *wakeref == INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF) > INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF is a wrapper for an error pointer - how about > IS_ERR_OR_NULL() macro? Without going a bit deeper into the code > it is not apparent that INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF is indicating an error. > > Nice catch nevertheless.
It's not a nice catch. It's wrong [1]. BR, Jani. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/87cyglg9w2....@intel.com > > Krzysztof > >> return NULL; >> >> intel_engine_pm_get(ce->engine); >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> -- Jani Nikula, Intel
