Hi Heiko,

At 2025-01-02 19:56:55, "Heiko Stübner" <he...@sntech.de> wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 25. Dezember 2024, 11:37:31 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
>> From: Andy Yan <andy....@rock-chips.com>
>> 
>> The HDMI on RK3576 shares the same IP block (PHY and Controller)
>> with rk3588.
>> However, there are some control bits scattered in different GRF.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy....@rock-chips.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casan...@collabora.com>
>> Tested-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casan...@collabora.com>
>
>The attribution is strange. Where does the Signed-off from Detlev come
>from?
>
>At that position it would mean that he's the sender, but that's obviously
>not the case.
>
>I guess it's either just the Tested-by ... or you need an additional

>Co-Developed-by if Detlev contributed to this patch.


Oh,  this is because at the very beginning, we created some shared branch and 
then pick patches  between
Detlev's and mine branch, I think this SoB is left by 'git cherry-pick -s', I 
will drop it in V2.
.
>
>
>> ---
>> 
>>  .../gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c    | 143 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c
>> index b21e868e7c16..bd9216e45e74 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c
>[...]
>> @@ -287,8 +422,12 @@ static const struct rockchip_hdmi_qp_cfg 
>> rk3588_hdmi_cfg = {
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct of_device_id dw_hdmi_qp_rockchip_dt_ids[] = {
>> -    { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-dw-hdmi-qp",
>> -      .data = &rk3588_hdmi_cfg },
>> +    { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3576-dw-hdmi-qp",
>> +      .data = &rk3576_hdmi_cfg
>> +    }, {
>> +      .compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-dw-hdmi-qp",
>> +      .data = &rk3588_hdmi_cfg
>> +    },
>
>nit: please keep consistent styling between the listentries. Right now the
>rk3576 and changed rk3588 entries use different styles.
>
>
>Heiko
>
>

Reply via email to