On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:13:29 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:

> I guess the "fix" would be to have the check code ignore pointer to
> arrays, assuming they are "ok".

Can you try this patch?

-- Steve

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 1545cc8b49d0..770e7ed91716 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -364,6 +364,18 @@ static bool process_string(const char *fmt, int len, 
struct trace_event_call *ca
                s = r + 1;
        } while (s < e);
 
+       /*
+        * Check for arrays. If the argument has: foo[REC->val]
+        * then it is very likely that foo is an array of strings
+        * that are safe to use.
+        */
+       r = strstr(s, "[");
+       if (r && r < e) {
+               r = strstr(r, "REC->");
+               if (r && r < e)
+                       return true;
+       }
+
        /*
         * If there's any strings in the argument consider this arg OK as it
         * could be: REC->field ? "foo" : "bar" and we don't want to get into

Reply via email to