On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:21:51 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@collabora.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 21:06:18 +0000
> Adrián Larumbe <adrian.laru...@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> > Avoid waiting for the DRM scheduler job timedout handler, and instead, let
> > the DRM scheduler core signal the error fence immediately when HW job
> > submission fails.
> >
> > That means we must also decrement the runtime-PM refcnt for the device,
> > because the job will never be enqueued or inflight.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.laru...@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
> > index f640d211cc3a..3f4f0682d69d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
> > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ panfrost_enqueue_job(struct panfrost_device *pfdev, int
> > slot,
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > -static void panfrost_job_hw_submit(struct panfrost_job *job, int js)
> > +static int panfrost_job_hw_submit(struct panfrost_job *job, int js)
> > {
> > struct panfrost_device *pfdev = job->pfdev;
> > unsigned int subslot;
> > @@ -207,10 +207,11 @@ static void panfrost_job_hw_submit(struct
> > panfrost_job *job, int js)
> >
> > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(pfdev->base.dev);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - return;
> > + goto err_hwsubmit;
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(job_read(pfdev, JS_COMMAND_NEXT(js)))) {
> > - return;
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto err_hwsubmit;
> > }
> >
> > cfg = panfrost_mmu_as_get(pfdev, job->mmu);
> > @@ -261,6 +262,12 @@ static void panfrost_job_hw_submit(struct panfrost_job
> > *job, int js)
> > job, js, subslot, jc_head, cfg & 0xf);
> > }
> > spin_unlock(&pfdev->js->job_lock);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_hwsubmit:
> > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pfdev->base.dev);
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int panfrost_acquire_object_fences(struct drm_gem_object **bos,
> > @@ -382,6 +389,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *panfrost_job_run(struct
> > drm_sched_job *sched_job)
> > struct panfrost_device *pfdev = job->pfdev;
> > int slot = panfrost_job_get_slot(job);
> > struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > if (unlikely(job->base.s_fence->finished.error))
> > return NULL;
> > @@ -400,7 +408,11 @@ static struct dma_fence *panfrost_job_run(struct
> > drm_sched_job *sched_job)
> > dma_fence_put(job->done_fence);
> > job->done_fence = dma_fence_get(fence);
> >
> > - panfrost_job_hw_submit(job, slot);
> > + ret = panfrost_job_hw_submit(job, slot);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dma_fence_put(job->done_fence);
>
> If you call dma_fence_put() here, you need to set job->done_fence to
> NULL, otherwise dma_fence_put() will be called again on an already
> freed fence in panfrost_job_cleanup(). Question is, do we really need
> to call dma_fence_put(job->done_fence) here? Can't we let the job
> destructor take care of that?
My bad, it's the ref you've taken to return to drm_sched you're
releasing here. I'd go for `dma_fence_put(fence)` to make that clear.
With this minor change, the patch is
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@collabora.com>
>
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > + }
> >
> > return fence;
> > }
>
