We don't want kernel pinned resources (ring, indirect state) in the VM's
bulk move as these are unevictable.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index 549866da5cd1..96dbc88b1f55 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -1470,6 +1470,9 @@ __xe_bo_create_locked(struct xe_device *xe,
{
struct xe_bo *bo = NULL;
int err;
+ bool want_bulk = vm && !xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm) &&
+ flags & XE_BO_FLAG_USER &&
+ !(flags & (XE_BO_FLAG_PINNED | XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT));
if (vm)
xe_vm_assert_held(vm);
@@ -1488,9 +1491,7 @@ __xe_bo_create_locked(struct xe_device *xe,
}
bo = ___xe_bo_create_locked(xe, bo, tile, vm ? xe_vm_resv(vm) : NULL,
- vm && !xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm) &&
- flags & XE_BO_FLAG_USER ?
- &vm->lru_bulk_move : NULL, size,
+ want_bulk ? &vm->lru_bulk_move : NULL, size,
cpu_caching, type, flags);
if (IS_ERR(bo))
return bo;
@@ -1781,9 +1782,6 @@ int xe_bo_pin(struct xe_bo *bo)
struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo);
int err;
- /* We currently don't expect user BO to be pinned */
- xe_assert(xe, !xe_bo_is_user(bo));
-
/* Pinned object must be in GGTT or have pinned flag */
xe_assert(xe, bo->flags & (XE_BO_FLAG_PINNED |
XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT));
--
2.34.1
