Hi Christophe, On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:19:24PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 12/11/2024 à 23:43, Laurent Pinchart a écrit : > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:12:25PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > >> 'struct i2c_device_id' is not modified in these drivers. > >> > >> Constifying this structure moves some data to a read-only section, so > >> increase overall security. > >> > >> On a x86_64, with allmodconfig, as an example: > >> Before: > >> ====== > >> text data bss dec hex filename > >> 15566 987 32 16585 40c9 > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/chipone-icn6211.o > >> > >> After: > >> ===== > >> text data bss dec hex filename > >> 15630 923 32 16585 40c9 > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/chipone-icn6211.o > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> > >> --- > >> Compile tested-only. > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/chipone-icn6211.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9211.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 2 +- > > > > While at it, could you address drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda9950.c too ? If I > > were to push a tad more, there are only two other drivers in the kernel > > with the same issues outside of drivers/gpu/ according to > > Hi Laurent, > > this is in my todo list. I wanted to send it separately because all > these files are in gpu/drm/bridge/ and tda9950.c is in gpu/drm/. > > Most of the times, maintainers ask for separate patches when several > drivers are patched. For such clean-ups, I try at least to group them by > directory.
I would probably have included tda9950.c in this patch, but I'm also fine handling it separately. > Same answer the other files in input and sound. Patches will be sent in > a few days. Thank you. If you have extra time, there are also a handful of similar issues with of_device_id :-) > I've also sent one for the documentation [1] and will send one for > const_structs.checkpatch as well. Thank you for that. > CJ > > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/c8e6da4adb7381ee27e8e11854c9d856382cdc93.1731445244.git.christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr/ > > > $ git grep '^static struct i2c_device_id' > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/chipone-icn6211.c:static struct i2c_device_id > > chipone_i2c_id[] = { > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9211.c:static struct i2c_device_id > > lt9211_id[] = { > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c:static struct i2c_device_id > > lt9611_id[] = { > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c:static struct i2c_device_id > > lt9611uxc_id[] = { > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:static struct i2c_device_id > > sn65dsi83_id[] = { > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:static struct i2c_device_id > > ti_sn65dsi86_id[] = { > > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda9950.c:static struct i2c_device_id tda9950_ids[] = { > > drivers/input/keyboard/cypress-sf.c:static struct i2c_device_id > > cypress_sf_id_table[] = { > > sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51-i2c.c:static struct i2c_device_id cs42l51_i2c_id[] > > = { > > > > :-) > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com> > > > >> 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
