On 05/11/2024 18:06, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:58:10PM +0000, Matt Coster wrote: >> This attribute will be required for the BXS-4-64 MC1 and will be enabled in >> the DTS for the TI k3-j721s2 in a subsequent patch; add it now so >> dtbs_check doesn't complain later. > > Sounds like the property should be made required for that integration.
This is something I went back and forth on. Where is the line drawn between things that should be enforced in bindings and things that only ever need to be specified once, so should just be left to the dt itself to be the source of truth? Having said that, I realise TI could spin a new SoC with a new dt but use the same compatible string for the GPU; the "single" source of truth then wouldn't be so single anymore. I guess by making this property required for this compatible string, we're saying any use of it must behave in exactly the same way, right? Cheers, Matt >> Signed-off-by: Matt Coster <matt.cos...@imgtec.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml >> index >> 55f422be1bc5b7564e3e81f24c4b93857f3e12fe..8a1861ca960c48853b2ceef414f588cc343b49b2 >> 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/img,powervr-rogue.yaml >> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ properties: >> - const: a >> - const: b >> >> + dma-coherent: true >> + >> required: >> - compatible >> - reg >> >> -- >> 2.47.0 >> -- Matt Coster E: matt.cos...@imgtec.com
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
