Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/panic: allow verbose boolean for clarity

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:54 AM Jocelyn Falempe <jfale...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> With the suggestions from Alice Ryhl to not introduce a return, and use
> expect:

+1 to both.

`expect` (here and the other ones I suggested) require `rust-next`, so
if this goes through DRM, then we can clean this up later. Otherwise,
if you prefer `rust-next`, we can change them to `expect` already.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel