It is possible, although unlikely, that an integer overflow will occur
when the result of radeon_get_ib_value() is shifted to the left.
Avoid it by casting one of the operands to larger data type (u64).
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static
analysis tool SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Igor Artemiev <igor.a.artem...@mcst.ru>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
index 1b2d31c4d77c..ac77d1246b94 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
@@ -2104,7 +2104,7 @@ static int r600_packet3_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
return -EINVAL;
}
- offset = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx+1) << 8;
+ offset = (u64)radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx+1) << 8;
if (offset != track->vgt_strmout_bo_offset[idx_value]) {
DRM_ERROR("bad STRMOUT_BASE_UPDATE, bo offset
does not match: 0x%llx, 0x%x\n",
offset,
track->vgt_strmout_bo_offset[idx_value]);
--
2.39.2
