On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:25 PM <hermes...@ite.com.tw> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> BR,
> Hermes
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> >Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 2:16 PM
> >To: Hermes Wu (吳佳宏) <hermes...@ite.com.tw>
> >Cc: treapk...@chromium.org; a.ha...@samsung.com; narmstr...@baylibre.com; 
> >robert.f...@linaro.org; laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com; jo...@kwiboo.se; 
> >jernej.>skra...@gmail.com; airl...@gmail.com; dan...@ffwll.ch; 
> >dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Kenneth Hung 
> >(洪家倫) <kenneth.h...@ite.com.tw>
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/bridge: it6505: HDCP CTS fail on repeater items
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 05:21:41AM GMT, hermes...@ite.com.tw wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Sorry for the confusion caused
> >
> >Please don't top post. Answers should come below the original quoted
> >text, not above it. Otherwise reading the email becomes really hard.
> >
> >>
> >> Last patches did not switch to drm-misc-nest. And I need re-create patches.
> >>
> >> The HDCP patches is now on tow threads.(This one and the one include MCCS 
> >> patches with cover letter)
> >
> >Just make sure that when you send the next iteration of the HDCP + MCSS
> >patches you provide the history of the changes in the changelog (either
> >in the cover letter or in the individual patches). Also please don't
> >send several patches using the same vN. I'd point out the 'b4' tool, it
> >can automate a lot of such topics for you.
> >
> I will check using of B4 tools
>
> >> Should I keep on this thread or restart a new thread?
> >
> >Please always send new revisions as a new thread. Otherwise your patches
> >can easily get lost.
> >
> >I suppose that [1] is the latest revision. Please review and implement
> >the feedback that was provided to all iterations of your pachset, then
> >send v3 as a separate new thread.
> >
> >[1] 
> >https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/vxs3eklfifsnaq5rn6kppegfv3plsviqaq5nvlzo3fgazwj6y7@od4atbvf5ep3/T/#u
> >
>
> A suggestion that a aux path need separate to different path, this change 
> will before HDCP
I assume you mean something needs to be a separate patch...? I don't
really get this sentence.
> Won't it become more complicate?
>
> it goes like this?
>
> Patch V1 aux
> Patch V3 HDCP
> Patch V3 MCCS
The whole series should share the same version number, so you can send
out a v3 series that contains these three patches. Just mark the new
aux patch as "new in v3" in your change log.

Regards,
Pin-yen
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Hermes
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2024 11:50 PM
> >> To: Pin-yen Lin <treapk...@chromium.org>
> >> Cc: Hermes Wu (吳佳宏) <hermes...@ite.com.tw>; Andrzej Hajda 
> >> <a.ha...@samsung.com>; Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>; Robert 
> >> Foss <robert.f...@linaro.org>; >Laurent Pinchart 
> >> <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>; Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se>; 
> >> Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skra...@gmail.com>; David Airlie 
> >> <airl...@gmail.com>; >Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>; open list:DRM 
> >> DRIVERS <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; open list 
> >> <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Kenneth Hung (洪家倫) 
> >> <Kenneth.>h...@ite.com.tw>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/bridge: it6505: HDCP CTS fail on repeater items
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 01:27:54PM GMT, Pin-yen Lin wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:58 AM <hermes...@ite.com.tw> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > From: Hermes Wu <hermes...@ite.com.tw>
> >> > >
> >> > > Fix HDCP CTS items on UNIGRAF DPR-100.
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Hermes Wu <hermes...@ite.com.tw>
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapk...@chromium.org>
> >>
> >> For the sake of somebody applying the patch because it was R-B'ed
> >>
> >> Nacked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> The commit message doesn't describe what is being done and why, it
> >> doesn't have Fixes tags, etc.
> >>
> >> Hermes, I'm not sure what's happening on your side. I have seen several
> >> revisions of this patch with minimal modifications (and being a part of
> >> different series). Some of them were marked as v1 (although you've sent
> >> different patches as v1), other had v2 (but no changelog, etc). Please
> >> adhere to the described process of sending patches.
> >>
> >> --
> >> With best wishes
> >> Dmitry
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
>
> BR,
> Hermes
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 2:16 PM
> To: Hermes Wu (吳佳宏) <hermes...@ite.com.tw>
> Cc: treapk...@chromium.org; a.ha...@samsung.com; narmstr...@baylibre.com; 
> robert.f...@linaro.org; laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com; jo...@kwiboo.se; 
> jernej.skra...@gmail.com; airl...@gmail.com; dan...@ffwll.ch; 
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Kenneth Hung 
> (洪家倫) <kenneth.h...@ite.com.tw>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/bridge: it6505: HDCP CTS fail on repeater items
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 05:21:41AM GMT, hermes...@ite.com.tw wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion caused
>
> Please don't top post. Answers should come below the original quoted text, 
> not above it. Otherwise reading the email becomes really hard.
>
> >
> > Last patches did not switch to drm-misc-nest. And I need re-create patches.
> >
> > The HDCP patches is now on tow threads.(This one and the one include
> > MCCS patches with cover letter)
>
> Just make sure that when you send the next iteration of the HDCP + MCSS 
> patches you provide the history of the changes in the changelog (either in 
> the cover letter or in the individual patches). Also please don't send 
> several patches using the same vN. I'd point out the 'b4' tool, it can 
> automate a lot of such topics for you.
>
> > Should I keep on this thread or restart a new thread?
>
> Please always send new revisions as a new thread. Otherwise your patches can 
> easily get lost.
>
> I suppose that [1] is the latest revision. Please review and implement the 
> feedback that was provided to all iterations of your pachset, then send v3 as 
> a separate new thread.
>
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/vxs3eklfifsnaq5rn6kppegfv3plsviqaq5nvlzo3fgazwj6y7@od4atbvf5ep3/T/#u
>
> >
> >
> > BR,
> > Hermes
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2024 11:50 PM
> > To: Pin-yen Lin <treapk...@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Hermes Wu (吳佳宏) <hermes...@ite.com.tw>; Andrzej Hajda
> > <a.ha...@samsung.com>; Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>;
> > Robert Foss <robert.f...@linaro.org>; Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>; Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se>;
> > Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skra...@gmail.com>; David Airlie
> > <airl...@gmail.com>; Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>; open list:DRM
> > DRIVERS <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; open list
> > <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Kenneth Hung (洪家倫)
> > <kenneth.h...@ite.com.tw>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/bridge: it6505: HDCP CTS fail on repeater
> > items
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 01:27:54PM GMT, Pin-yen Lin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:58 AM <hermes...@ite.com.tw> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Hermes Wu <hermes...@ite.com.tw>
> > > >
> > > > Fix HDCP CTS items on UNIGRAF DPR-100.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hermes Wu <hermes...@ite.com.tw>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapk...@chromium.org>
> >
> > For the sake of somebody applying the patch because it was R-B'ed
> >
> > Nacked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> >
> > The commit message doesn't describe what is being done and why, it
> > doesn't have Fixes tags, etc.
> >
> > Hermes, I'm not sure what's happening on your side. I have seen
> > several revisions of this patch with minimal modifications (and being
> > a part of different series). Some of them were marked as v1 (although
> > you've sent different patches as v1), other had v2 (but no changelog,
> > etc). Please adhere to the described process of sending patches.
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry

Reply via email to