Dear Sascha,

Thank you for your reply.



On 2024/9/18 下午 06:58, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Hi,

The driver has a few minor whitespace issues, please run through
checkpatch.pl to catch them.

I will fix it.


Some more things inline.

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 09:03:08AM +0000, Hui-Ping Chen wrote:
Nuvoton MA35 SoCs NAND Flash Interface Controller
supports 2kiB, 4kiB and 8kiB page size, and up to
8-bit, 12-bit, and 24-bit hardware ECC calculation
circuit to protect data.

Signed-off-by: Hui-Ping Chen <hpchen0...@gmail.com>
---
  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig               |   8 +
  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Makefile              |   1 +
  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuvoton_ma35d1_nand.c | 935 +++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 944 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuvoton_ma35d1_nand.c

+#define SKIP_SPARE_BYTES       4
Unused, please drop.

I will remove it.


+static int ma35_nfi_ecc_check(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned long addr)
+{
+       struct ma35_nand_info *nand = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
+       struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
+       int status, i, j, nchunks = 0;
status should be unsigned.

Okay, I will modify it.


+       int report_err = 0;
+       int err_cnt = 0;
+
+       nchunks = mtd->writesize / chip->ecc.steps;
+       if (nchunks < 4)
+               nchunks = 1;
+       else
+               nchunks /= 4;
+
+       for (j = 0; j < nchunks; j++) {
+               status = readl(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDECCES0 + j*4);
+               if (!status)
+                       continue;
+
+               for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+                       if (!(status & ECC_STATUS_MASK)) {
+                               /* No error */
+                               status >>= 8;
+                               continue;
+
+                       } else if ((status & ECC_STATUS_MASK) == 0x01) {
+                               /* Correctable error */
+                               err_cnt = (status >> 2) & ECC_ERR_CNT_MASK;
+                               dev_warn(nand->dev, "nchunks (%d, %d) have %d 
error!\n",
+                                       j, i, err_cnt);
Correctable bitflips are expected. Please don't spam the log with it.

I will remove it.


+                               ma35_nfi_correct(nand, j*4+i, err_cnt, (u8 
*)addr);
+                               report_err += err_cnt;
+
+                       } else {
+                               /* uncorrectable error */
+                               dev_warn(nand->dev, "uncorrectable error! 
0x%4x\n", status);
+                               return -1;
+                       }
+                       status >>= 8;
+               }
+       }
+       return report_err;
There are a few things wrong here. Your chip->ecc.read_page op must
return the maximum number of bitflips occured on a subpage while
reading a page.

To archieve this I suggest you fix the return value of this function
accordingly and call it from chip->ecc.read_page rather than from the
interrupt handler.

Nevertheless mtd->ecc_stats.corrected counts the total number of
bitflips, so you must handle this counter in this function.

See rk_nfc_read_page_hwecc() as an example of a driver which gets it
right.

The background is that we have to rewrite the page once one ECC block
hits a critical bitflip limit. A whole page might be fine when the
bitflips are evenly distributed across the subpages, but it's not when
all bitflips are occur in a single subpage.

I will refer to rk_nfc_read_page_hwecc() and then rewrite it.


+static int ma35_nand_do_write(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *addr, u32 len)
+{
+       struct ma35_nand_info *nand = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
+       struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
+       dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+       int ret = 0, i;
+       u32 val, reg;
+
+       ma35_nand_target_enable(nand);
+
+       if (len != mtd->writesize) {
+               for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+                       writel(addr[i], nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDDATA);
+               ma35_nand_target_disable(nand);
+               return ret;
+       }
+
+       /* Check the DMA status before enabling the DMA */
+       ret = readl_poll_timeout(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_DMACTL, val,
+                                !(val & DMA_BUSY), 50, HZ/2);
+       if (ret)
+               dev_warn(nand->dev, "dma busy\n");
+
+       /* Reinitial dmac */
+       ma35_nand_dmac_init(nand);
The function name already says it and the comment doesn't offer any
additional information. Please drop such comments.

I will remove it.


+
+       writel(mtd->oobsize, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDRACTL);
+
+       /* setup and start DMA using dma_addr */
+       writel(INT_DMA, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDINTEN);
+       /* To mark this page as dirty. */
+       reg = readl(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDRA0);
+       if (reg & 0xffff0000)
+               writel(reg & 0xffff, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDRA0);
+
+       /* Fill dma_addr */
+       dma_addr = dma_map_single(nand->dev, (void *)addr, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+       dma_sync_single_for_device(nand->dev, dma_addr, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+       ret = dma_mapping_error(nand->dev, dma_addr);
+       if (ret) {
+               dev_err(nand->dev, "dma mapping error\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
Call dma_sync_single_for_device() after you have checked for an error
with dma_mapping_error().

That said, I think calling dma_sync_single_for_device() after
dma_map_single() is unnecessary.

I will modify the calling sequence.


+
+       writel((unsigned long)dma_addr, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_DMASA);
+       writel(readl(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDCTL) | DMA_W_EN,
+               nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDCTL);
+       ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nand->complete, 
msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
+       if (!ret) {
+               dev_err(nand->dev, "write timeout\n");
+               ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+       }
+
+       dma_unmap_single(nand->dev, dma_addr, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+
+       ma35_nand_target_disable(nand);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int ma35_nand_do_read(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *addr, u32 len)
The addr argument shouldn't be const. You are supposed to write to this
buffer and you actually do so.

I will change this argument to u8 *.


+{
+       struct ma35_nand_info *nand = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
+       struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
+       u8 *ptr = (u8 *)addr;
+       dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+       int ret = 0, i;
+       u32 val;
+
+       ma35_nand_target_enable(nand);
+
+       if (len != mtd->writesize) {
+               for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+                       *(ptr+i) = (u8)readl(nand->regs + 
MA35_NFI_REG_NANDDATA);
+               ma35_nand_target_disable(nand);
+               return ret;
Just return 0 here. It's easier to read than having to look up the
initialization value.

I will change it to return 0 directly.


+       }
+
+       /* Check the DMA status before enabling the DMA */
+       ret = readl_poll_timeout(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_DMACTL, val,
+                                !(val & DMA_BUSY), 50, HZ/2);
+       if (ret)
+               dev_warn(nand->dev, "dma busy\n");
+
+       /* Reinitial dmac */
+       ma35_nand_dmac_init(nand);
+
+       writel(mtd->oobsize, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDRACTL);
+
+       /* setup and start DMA using dma_addr */
+       dma_addr = dma_map_single(nand->dev, (void *)addr, len, 
DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+       ret = dma_mapping_error(nand->dev, dma_addr);
+       if (ret) {
+               dev_err(nand->dev, "dma mapping error\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+       nand->dma_buf = (u8 *)addr;
+       nand->dma_addr = dma_addr;
+
+       writel((unsigned long)dma_addr, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_DMASA);
+       writel(readl(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDCTL) | DMA_R_EN,
+               nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDCTL);
+       ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nand->complete, 
msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
+       if (!ret) {
+               dev_err(nand->dev, "read timeout\n");
+               ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+       }
+
+       dma_sync_single_for_cpu(nand->dev, dma_addr, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+       dma_unmap_single(nand->dev, dma_addr, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
No need to call dma_sync_single_for_cpu() before dma_unmap_single().

I will remove it.


+
+       ma35_nand_target_disable(nand);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+
+static int ma35_nand_write_page_hwecc(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
+                                     int oob_required, int page)
+{
+       struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
+       u8 *ecc_calc = chip->ecc.calc_buf;
Make this a void * to get rid of the explicit casting below.

I will modify it.


+
+       ma35_clear_spare(chip, mtd->oobsize);
+       ma35_write_spare(chip, mtd->oobsize - chip->ecc.total, (u32 
*)chip->oob_poi);
+
+       nand_prog_page_begin_op(chip, page, 0, buf, mtd->writesize);
+       nand_prog_page_end_op(chip);
+
+       /* Copy parity code in NANDRA to calc */
+       ma35_read_spare(chip, chip->ecc.total, (u32 *)ecc_calc,
+                       mtd->oobsize - chip->ecc.total);
+
+       /* Copy parity code in calc to oob_poi */
+       memcpy((void *)(chip->oob_poi + (mtd->oobsize - chip->ecc.total)),
+               (void *)ecc_calc, chip->ecc.total);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t ma35_nand_irq(int irq, void *id)
+{
+       struct ma35_nand_info *nand = (struct ma35_nand_info *)id;
+       struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(&nand->chip);
+       int stat = 0;
+       u32 isr;
+
+       spin_lock(&nand->dma_lock);
+
+       isr = readl(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDINTSTS);
+       if (isr & INT_ECC) {
+               dma_sync_single_for_cpu(nand->dev, nand->dma_addr, 
mtd->writesize,
+                                       DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+               stat = ma35_nfi_ecc_check(&nand->chip, (unsigned 
long)nand->dma_buf);
nand->dma_buf already is a pointer which you cast to unisgned long here
and back to a pointer in ma35_nfi_ecc_check(). ma35_nfi_ecc_check()
should take a poiner instead.

I will fix it.


+               if (stat < 0) {
+                       mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
+                       writel(DMA_RST | DMA_EN, nand->regs + 
MA35_NFI_REG_DMACTL);
+                       writel(readl(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDCTL) | SWRST,
+                               nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDCTL);
+               } else if (stat > 0) {
+                       mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;   /* Add corrected 
bit count */
+               }
+               writel(INT_ECC, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDINTSTS);
+       }
+       if (isr & INT_DMA) {
+               writel(INT_DMA, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDINTSTS);
+               complete(&nand->complete);
+       }
+       spin_unlock(&nand->dma_lock);
+
+       return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int ma35_nfc_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
+                         const struct nand_operation *op,
+                         bool check_only)
+{
+       struct ma35_nand_info *nand = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
+       u32 i, reg;
+       int ret = 0;
+
+       if (check_only)
+               return 0;
+
+       ma35_nand_target_enable(nand);
+       reg = readl(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDINTSTS);
+       reg |= INT_RB0;
+       writel(reg, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDINTSTS);
+
+       for (i = 0; i < op->ninstrs; i++) {
+               ret = ma35_nfc_exec_instr(chip, &op->instrs[i]);
+               if (ret)
+                       break;
+       }
The way ma35_nand_target_[en|dis]able() is called looks inconsistent.

This function calls ma35_nand_target_enable(), so I would expect that
the corresponding ma35_nand_target_disable() should be called here as
well.

ma35_nand_do_read() is called from here which has its own call to
ma35_nand_target_enable(), but it doesn't call ma35_nand_target_disable()
from all of its return pathes.

Okay. I will check and fix it.


+
+       ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, nand->irq, ma35_nand_irq,
+                                 IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, "ma35d1-nand", nand);
+       if (ret) {
+               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request NAND irq\n");
+               clk_disable_unprepare(nand->clk);
You used devm_clk_get_enabled(), so this will be done automatically.

I will remove it.


+               return -ENXIO;
+       }
+
+       nand->chip.controller = &nand->controller;
+       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nand);
+
+       chip->options |= NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE | NAND_USES_DMA;
+
+       /* set default mode in case dt entry is missing */
+       chip->ecc.engine_type = NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_ON_HOST;
+
+       chip->ecc.write_page = ma35_nand_write_page_hwecc;
+       chip->ecc.read_page  = ma35_nand_read_page_hwecc;
+       chip->ecc.read_oob   = ma35_nand_read_oob_hwecc;
+
+       mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
+       mtd->priv = chip;
+       mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+       mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
+
+       writel(NAND_EN, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_GCTL);
+
+       ret = nand_scan(chip, 1);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       ret = mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
+       if (ret) {
+               nand_cleanup(chip);
+               devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, nand);
Unnecessary free. Drop it.

I will remove it.


+               return ret;
+       }
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static void ma35_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       struct ma35_nand_info *nand = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+       int ret;
+
+       devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, nand->irq, nand);
devm_ is a mechanism to let resources be freed automatically. There's
normally no need to do this manually.

Okay. I will check and remove it.


Sascha


Best regards,

Hui-Ping Chen


Reply via email to