On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 04:31:01PM -0600, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Matthew 
> Brost
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 2:32 PM
> To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/xe: Faster devcoredump
> > 
> > The current algorithm to read out devcoredump is O(N*N) where N is the
> > size of coredump due to usage of the drm_coredump_printer in
> > xe_devcoredump_read. Switch to a O(N) algorithm which prints the
> > devcoredump into a readable format in snapshot work and update
> > xe_devcoredump_read to memcpy from the readable format directly.
> > 
> > v2:
> >  - Fix double free on devcoredump removal (Testing)
> >  - Set read_data_size after snap work flush
> >  - Adjust remaining in iterator upon realloc (Testing)
> >  - Set read_data upon realloc (Testing)
> > v3:
> >  - Kernel doc
> > 
> > Reported-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2408
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c       | 112 ++++++++++++++++------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump_types.h |   4 +
> >  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> > index d8d8ca2c19d3..b802a35c22f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> > @@ -66,22 +66,9 @@ static struct xe_guc *exec_queue_to_guc(struct 
> > xe_exec_queue *q)
> >     return &q->gt->uc.guc;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void xe_devcoredump_deferred_snap_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > -{
> > -   struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *ss = container_of(work, typeof(*ss), 
> > work);
> > -
> > -   /* keep going if fw fails as we still want to save the memory and SW 
> > data */
> > -   if (xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(ss->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL))
> > -           xe_gt_info(ss->gt, "failed to get forcewake for coredump 
> > capture\n");
> > -   xe_vm_snapshot_capture_delayed(ss->vm);
> > -   xe_guc_exec_queue_snapshot_capture_delayed(ss->ge);
> > -   xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(ss->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static ssize_t xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
> > -                              size_t count, void *data, size_t datalen)
> > +static ssize_t __xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, size_t count,
> > +                                struct xe_devcoredump *coredump)
> >  {
> > -   struct xe_devcoredump *coredump = data;
> >     struct xe_device *xe;
> >     struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *ss;
> >     struct drm_printer p;
> > @@ -89,18 +76,12 @@ static ssize_t xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t 
> > offset,
> >     struct timespec64 ts;
> >     int i;
> >  
> > -   if (!coredump)
> > -           return -ENODEV;
> > -
> >     xe = coredump_to_xe(coredump);
> >     ss = &coredump->snapshot;
> >  
> > -   /* Ensure delayed work is captured before continuing */
> > -   flush_work(&ss->work);
> > -
> >     iter.data = buffer;
> >     iter.offset = 0;
> > -   iter.start = offset;
> > +   iter.start = 0;
> >     iter.remain = count;
> >  
> >     p = drm_coredump_printer(&iter);
> > @@ -131,13 +112,86 @@ static ssize_t xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, 
> > loff_t offset,
> >     drm_printf(&p, "\n**** VM state ****\n");
> >     xe_vm_snapshot_print(coredump->snapshot.vm, &p);
> >  
> > -   return count - iter.remain;
> > +   return iter.offset;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void xe_devcoredump_snapshot_free(struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot 
> > *ss)
> > +{
> > +   int i;
> > +
> > +   xe_guc_ct_snapshot_free(ss->ct);
> > +   ss->ct = NULL;
> > +
> > +   xe_guc_exec_queue_snapshot_free(ss->ge);
> > +   ss->ge = NULL;
> > +
> > +   xe_sched_job_snapshot_free(ss->job);
> > +   ss->job = NULL;
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < XE_NUM_HW_ENGINES; i++)
> > +           if (ss->hwe[i]) {
> > +                   xe_hw_engine_snapshot_free(ss->hwe[i]);
> > +                   ss->hwe[i] = NULL;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +   xe_vm_snapshot_free(ss->vm);
> > +   ss->vm = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void xe_devcoredump_deferred_snap_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > +   struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *ss = container_of(work, typeof(*ss), 
> > work);
> > +   struct xe_devcoredump *coredump = container_of(ss, typeof(*coredump), 
> > snapshot);
> > +
> > +   /* keep going if fw fails as we still want to save the memory and SW 
> > data */
> > +   if (xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(ss->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL))
> > +           xe_gt_info(ss->gt, "failed to get forcewake for coredump 
> > capture\n");
> > +   xe_vm_snapshot_capture_delayed(ss->vm);
> > +   xe_guc_exec_queue_snapshot_capture_delayed(ss->ge);
> > +   xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(ss->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> > +
> > +   /* Calculate devcoredump size */
> > +   ss->read_data_size = __xe_devcoredump_read(NULL, INT_MAX, coredump);
> > +
> > +   ss->read_data = kvmalloc(ss->read_data_size, GFP_USER);
> > +   if (!ss->read_data)
> > +           return;
> > +
> > +   __xe_devcoredump_read(ss->read_data, ss->read_data_size, coredump);
> > +   xe_devcoredump_snapshot_free(ss);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
> > +                              size_t count, void *data, size_t datalen)
> > +{
> > +   struct xe_devcoredump *coredump = data;
> > +   struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *ss;
> > +   ssize_t byte_copied;
> > +
> > +   if (!coredump)
> > +           return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +   ss = &coredump->snapshot;
> > +
> > +   /* Ensure delayed work is captured before continuing */
> > +   flush_work(&ss->work);
> > +
> > +   if (!ss->read_data)
> > +           return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +   if (offset >= ss->read_data_size)
> > +           return 0;
> > +
> > +   byte_copied = count < ss->read_data_size - offset ? count :
> > +           ss->read_data_size - offset;
> > +   memcpy(buffer, ss->read_data + offset, byte_copied);
> > +
> > +   return byte_copied;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void xe_devcoredump_free(void *data)
> >  {
> >     struct xe_devcoredump *coredump = data;
> > -   int i;
> >  
> >     /* Our device is gone. Nothing to do... */
> >     if (!data || !coredump_to_xe(coredump))
> > @@ -145,13 +199,8 @@ static void xe_devcoredump_free(void *data)
> >  
> >     cancel_work_sync(&coredump->snapshot.work);
> >  
> > -   xe_guc_ct_snapshot_free(coredump->snapshot.ct);
> > -   xe_guc_exec_queue_snapshot_free(coredump->snapshot.ge);
> > -   xe_sched_job_snapshot_free(coredump->snapshot.job);
> > -   for (i = 0; i < XE_NUM_HW_ENGINES; i++)
> > -           if (coredump->snapshot.hwe[i])
> > -                   xe_hw_engine_snapshot_free(coredump->snapshot.hwe[i]);
> > -   xe_vm_snapshot_free(coredump->snapshot.vm);
> > +   xe_devcoredump_snapshot_free(&coredump->snapshot);
> > +   kvfree(coredump->snapshot.read_data);
> >  
> >     /* To prevent stale data on next snapshot, clear everything */
> >     memset(&coredump->snapshot, 0, sizeof(coredump->snapshot));
> > @@ -260,4 +309,5 @@ int xe_devcoredump_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> >  {
> >     return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, 
> > xe_driver_devcoredump_fini, &xe->drm);
> >  }
> > +
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump_types.h 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump_types.h
> > index 923cdf72a816..0298037edae4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump_types.h
> > @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot {
> >     struct xe_sched_job_snapshot *job;
> >     /** @vm: Snapshot of VM state */
> >     struct xe_vm_snapshot *vm;
> > +   /** @read_data_size: size of read data */
> > +   ssize_t read_data_size;
> > +   /** @read_data: Read data */
> > +   void *read_data;
> 
> Perhaps the data size and read data can be stapled together under the same
> struct?
> 
> struct {
>       ssize_t size;
>       void *data;
> } read_data;
> 

Yes, I like this better. Will change.

Matt

> It's not that big of a deal if this is untouched, just something to consider.
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cav...@intel.com>
> -Jonathan Cavitt
> 
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to