On 06/15/2010 04:43 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Justin, > > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:06:12 -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote: >> On 06/14/2010 01:53 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >>> Hi Justin, >>> >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:26:46 -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote: >>>> could be a right solution, could be wrong >>>> here is the warning: >>>> CC drivers/i2c/i2c-core.o >>>> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: In function 'i2c_register_adapter': >>>> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:757:15: warning: variable 'dummy' set but not used >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock at gmail.com> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 2 ++ >>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c >>>> index 1cca263..79c6c26 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c >>>> @@ -794,6 +794,8 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter >>>> *adap) >>>> mutex_lock(&core_lock); >>>> dummy = bus_for_each_drv(&i2c_bus_type, NULL, adap, >>>> __process_new_adapter); >>>> + if(!dummy) >>>> + dummy = 0; >>> >>> One word: scripts/checkpatch.pl >> >> it was this, and/or just take the code out >> (since I'm a newbie) > > I was not (yet) arguing on the code itself, but on its format. Any > patch you send should pass the formatting tests performed by > scripts/checkpatch.pl. Thanks. >
o.k. I'll make sure I run everything through checkpatch.pl before sending anything. Justin P. Mattock
