On 06/14/2010 01:48 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 13:26 Mon 14 Jun , Justin P. Mattock wrote: >> @@ -617,8 +616,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct >> cpu_key *key, /* Key to s >> >> pathrelse(search_path); >> >> - right_neighbor_of_leaf_node = 0; >> - >> + > > This hunk introduces whitespace on the empty line, which is not cool.
I can resend!!(biggest problem is working through these warnings) > >> /* With each iteration of this loop we search through the items in the >> current node, and calculate the next current node(next path element) >> for the next iteration of this loop.. */ >> @@ -695,8 +693,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct >> cpu_key *key, /* Key to s >> starting from the root. */ >> block_number = SB_ROOT_BLOCK(sb); >> expected_level = -1; >> - right_neighbor_of_leaf_node = 0; >> - >> + > > Here, too. > > Most of the patches in this series have similar issues. > main thing now(for me atleast)is, is this actual dead code or what? if not then something else needs to be done, if yes then I guess I can resend this, with out the whitespace issue. Justin P. Mattock
