On 18/06/2024 13.54, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
On 5/22/24 16:48, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
On 27/04/2024 15.40, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
Use the scope-based cleanup feature to clean up 'struct device_node *'
when they go out of scope, and remove all instances of of_node_put()
within the same scope, to simplify function exit and avoid potential
memory leaks.

Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany <amer.shanaw...@gmail.com>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c  | 14 ++++++--------
   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c |  4 +---
   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c  |  4 +---
   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
index c133e96b8aca..bb0bb052e595 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
@@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ static int vc4_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
       struct rpi_firmware *firmware = NULL;
       struct drm_device *drm;
       struct vc4_dev *vc4;
-    struct device_node *node;
       struct drm_crtc *crtc;
       bool is_vc5;
       int ret = 0;
@@ -302,11 +301,10 @@ static int vc4_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
       else
           driver = &vc4_drm_driver;
   -    node = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, vc4_dma_range_matches,
-                           NULL);
+    struct device_node *node __free(device_node) =
+        of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, vc4_dma_range_matches, NULL);
       if (node) {
           ret = of_dma_configure(dev, node, true);
-        of_node_put(node);
             if (ret)
               return ret;
@@ -341,10 +339,10 @@ static int vc4_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
               goto err;
       }
   -    node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, 
"raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware");
-    if (node) {
-        firmware = rpi_firmware_get(node);
-        of_node_put(node);
+    struct device_node *np __free(device_node) =
+        of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware");
+    if (np) {
+        firmware = rpi_firmware_get(np);
             if (!firmware) {
               ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
index d30f8e8e8967..915e8da3f41a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
@@ -3661,7 +3661,6 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct 
device *master, void *data)
       struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(master);
       struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi;
       struct drm_encoder *encoder;
-    struct device_node *ddc_node;
       int ret;
         vc4_hdmi = drmm_kzalloc(drm, sizeof(*vc4_hdmi), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -3699,14 +3698,13 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct 
device *master, void *data)
       if (ret)
           return ret;
   -    ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "ddc", 0);
+    struct device_node *ddc_node __free(device_node) = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, 
"ddc", 0);
       if (!ddc_node) {
           DRM_ERROR("Failed to find ddc node in device tree\n");
           return -ENODEV;
       }
         vc4_hdmi->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node);
-    of_node_put(ddc_node);
       if (!vc4_hdmi->ddc) {
           DRM_DEBUG("Failed to get ddc i2c adapter by node\n");
           return -EPROBE_DEFER;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
index 04af672caacb..6e3613e06e09 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
@@ -845,15 +845,13 @@ static int vc4_hvs_bind(struct device *dev, struct device 
*master, void *data)
         if (vc4->is_vc5) {
           struct rpi_firmware *firmware;
-        struct device_node *node;
+        struct device_node *node __free(device_node) = 
rpi_firmware_find_node();
           unsigned int max_rate;
   -        node = rpi_firmware_find_node();
           if (!node)
               return -EINVAL;
             firmware = rpi_firmware_get(node);
-        of_node_put(node);
           if (!firmware)
               return -EPROBE_DEFER;
Hi,

This patch is marked as new/archived on patchwork[1], however it didn't receive 
any feedback, and a similar patch has been already merged [2].


[1]: 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240427134044.38910-1-amer.shanaw...@gmail.com/

[2]: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d65bfb9546eb627e3c578336355c5b81797f2255

Thank you

Amer

Hello,

Could anyone kindly provide some feedback on this patch?

Thank you

Amer
Hello all,

I have come to realize that unsubscribing from the mailing list shortly after sending this patch prevented me from receiving any feedback. My apologies for this oversight.

Thank you

Amer

Reply via email to