On 6/17/24 2:07 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 06:25:10PM -0700, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
VMWARE_HYPERCALL alternative will not work as intended without
VMware guest code initialization.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
Closes:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406152104.fxakp1mb-...@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makha...@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig
index faddae3d6ac2..6f1ac940cbae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
config DRM_VMWGFX
tristate "DRM driver for VMware Virtual GPU"
depends on DRM && PCI && MMU
- depends on X86 || ARM64
+ depends on (X86 && HYPERVISOR_GUEST) || ARM64
select DRM_TTM
select DRM_TTM_HELPER
select MAPPING_DIRTY_HELPERS
--
Right, I'll queue this soon but it doesn't reproduce here with gcc-11 or gcc-13.
This must be something gcc-9 specific or so...
Not really a gcc related, but the matter of a config file. It is
reproducible if CONFIG_HYPERVISOR_GUEST not set, but
CONFIG_DRM_VMWGFX=y. And this combination was allowed before the fix.
Regards,
--Alexey
