The timeout when waiting for the PRE safe window is rather short, as
normally we would only need to wait a few dozen usecs for the problematic
scanline region to pass and we don't want to spin too long in case
something goes wrong. This however mixes badly with preemption, as we
can easily get scheduled away from the CPU for a longer time than our
timeout, in which case we would hit a spurious timeout and wrongly skip
the PRE update.

Instead of disabling preemption across the wait loop, potentially
impacting the overall system latency, use a wait loop with a fixed
max number of iterations, so time spent away from the CPU is not
accounted against the timeout budget.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <[email protected]>
---
v3: new patch
---
 drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-pre.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-pre.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-pre.c
index 2db797b50436..5b174cb8aefc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-pre.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-pre.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 
 #include <drm/drm_fourcc.h>
 #include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/genalloc.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -259,10 +260,6 @@ void ipu_pre_configure(struct ipu_pre *pre, unsigned int 
width,
 
 void ipu_pre_update(struct ipu_pre *pre, uint64_t modifier, unsigned int 
bufaddr)
 {
-       unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(5);
-       unsigned short current_yblock;
-       u32 val;
-
        if (bufaddr == pre->cur.bufaddr &&
            modifier == pre->cur.modifier)
                return;
@@ -273,8 +270,11 @@ void ipu_pre_update(struct ipu_pre *pre, uint64_t 
modifier, unsigned int bufaddr
        if (modifier != pre->cur.modifier)
                ipu_pre_configure_modifier(pre, modifier);
 
-       do {
-               if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+       for (int i = 0;;i++) {
+               unsigned short current_yblock;
+               u32 val;
+
+               if (i > 500) {
                        dev_warn(pre->dev, "timeout waiting for PRE safe 
window\n");
                        return;
                }
@@ -283,8 +283,14 @@ void ipu_pre_update(struct ipu_pre *pre, uint64_t 
modifier, unsigned int bufaddr
                current_yblock =
                        (val >> IPU_PRE_STORE_ENG_STATUS_STORE_BLOCK_Y_SHIFT) &
                        IPU_PRE_STORE_ENG_STATUS_STORE_BLOCK_Y_MASK;
-       } while (current_yblock == 0 ||
-                current_yblock >= pre->cur.safe_window_end);
+
+               if (current_yblock != 0 &&
+                   current_yblock < pre->cur.safe_window_end)
+                       break;
+
+               udelay(10);
+               cpu_relax();
+       }
 
        writel(pre->cur.ctrl | IPU_PRE_CTRL_SDW_UPDATE,
               pre->regs + IPU_PRE_CTRL);
-- 
2.39.2

Reply via email to