On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 03:19:02AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Make this driver DT-independent by calling the freshly created helpers,
> which reduce boilerplate and open the door for otherwise use cases. No
> functional changes for DT based systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingf...@linux.dev>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 41 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> index c7bef5c23927..58dc7492844f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> @@ -266,8 +266,9 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_timings 
> tfp410_default_timings = {
>  
>  static int tfp410_parse_timings(struct tfp410 *dvi, bool i2c)
>  {
> +     struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dvi->dev);
>       struct drm_bridge_timings *timings = &dvi->timings;
> -     struct device_node *ep;
> +     struct fwnode_handle *ep;
>       u32 pclk_sample = 0;
>       u32 bus_width = 24;
>       u32 deskew = 0;
> @@ -288,14 +289,14 @@ static int tfp410_parse_timings(struct tfp410 *dvi, 
> bool i2c)
>        * and EDGE pins. They are specified in DT through endpoint properties
>        * and vendor-specific properties.
>        */
> -     ep = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(dvi->dev->of_node, 0, 0);
> +     ep = fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id(fwnode, 0, 0, 0);
>       if (!ep)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
>       /* Get the sampling edge from the endpoint. */
> -     of_property_read_u32(ep, "pclk-sample", &pclk_sample);
> -     of_property_read_u32(ep, "bus-width", &bus_width);
> -     of_node_put(ep);
> +     fwnode_property_read_u32(ep, "pclk-sample", &pclk_sample);
> +     fwnode_property_read_u32(ep, "bus-width", &bus_width);
> +     fwnode_handle_put(ep);
>  
>       timings->input_bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_HIGH;
>  
> @@ -324,7 +325,7 @@ static int tfp410_parse_timings(struct tfp410 *dvi, bool 
> i2c)
>       }
>  
>       /* Get the setup and hold time from vendor-specific properties. */
> -     of_property_read_u32(dvi->dev->of_node, "ti,deskew", &deskew);
> +     fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "ti,deskew", &deskew);
>       if (deskew > 7)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -336,12 +337,12 @@ static int tfp410_parse_timings(struct tfp410 *dvi, 
> bool i2c)
>  
>  static int tfp410_init(struct device *dev, bool i2c)
>  {
> -     struct device_node *node;
> +     struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
>       struct tfp410 *dvi;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if (!dev->of_node) {
> -             dev_err(dev, "device-tree data is missing\n");
> +     if (!fwnode) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "firmware data is missing\n");
>               return -ENXIO;
>       }
>  
> @@ -352,8 +353,8 @@ static int tfp410_init(struct device *dev, bool i2c)
>       dvi->dev = dev;
>       dev_set_drvdata(dev, dvi);
>  
> +     drm_bridge_set_node(&dvi->bridge, fwnode);
>       dvi->bridge.funcs = &tfp410_bridge_funcs;
> -     dvi->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node;
>       dvi->bridge.timings = &dvi->timings;
>       dvi->bridge.type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DVID;
>  
> @@ -362,15 +363,15 @@ static int tfp410_init(struct device *dev, bool i2c)
>               return ret;
>  
>       /* Get the next bridge, connected to port@1. */
> -     node = of_graph_get_remote_node(dev->of_node, 1, -1);
> -     if (!node)
> -             return -ENODEV;
> -
> -     dvi->next_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(node);
> -     of_node_put(node);
> -
> -     if (!dvi->next_bridge)
> +     dvi->next_bridge = drm_bridge_find_next_bridge_by_fwnode(fwnode, 1);
> +     if (IS_ERR(dvi->next_bridge)) {
> +             ret = PTR_ERR(dvi->next_bridge);
> +             dev_err(dev, "Error in founding the next bridge: %d\n", ret);
> +             return ret;

Same comment regarding dev_err_probe().

LGTM otherwise.

> +     } else if (!dvi->next_bridge) {
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "Next bridge not found, deferring probe\n");
>               return -EPROBE_DEFER;

Looking at the bolerplate code, I think it would be better to make
drm_bridge_find_next_bridge_by_fwnode() reutrn -EPROBE_DEFER on its own.


> +     }
>  
>       /* Get the powerdown GPIO. */
>       dvi->powerdown = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "powerdown",
> @@ -422,10 +423,10 @@ static struct platform_driver tfp410_platform_driver = {
>  /* There is currently no i2c functionality. */
>  static int tfp410_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
> +     struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(&client->dev);
>       int reg;
>  
> -     if (!client->dev.of_node ||
> -         of_property_read_u32(client->dev.of_node, "reg", &reg)) {
> +     if (!fwnode || fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "reg", &reg)) {
>               dev_err(&client->dev,
>                       "Can't get i2c reg property from device-tree\n");
>               return -ENXIO;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to