On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:49:30PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com> wrote: >> > So with this revert we're OK with an undefined symbol if !CONFIG_PM, but >> > we're not happy >> > with a recursive dependency that is only triggered for COMPILE_TEST? I >> > would've thought >> > IOMMU_SUPPORT options is a better one. >> >> It's a real config. >> >> # CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST is not set > > So I can select CONFIG_ARM64 and CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC at the same time? > DRM_PANTHOR depends on ARM || ARM64 > and X86_LOCAL_APIC depends on X86_64. At some moment the recursive dependency > detector should've stopped as > there are no common dependencies between DRM_PANTHOR and X86_LOCAL_APIC and > going further just triggers false > positives. I'm curious how you've created your config now.
The thing is, I don't have *any* of the dependencies ARM || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST set in the config that triggered this. I don't have DRM_PANTHOR set. But make olddefconfig detects a circular dependency nonetheless. It's possible the issue is in kconfig. I don't know. But not being able to even dodge the warning makes it a show stopper. I wouldn't even know what to change in the config. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
