On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:42:04AM +0000, dharm...@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> 
> On 24/01/24 10:10 pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 03:30:16PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> >> Converted the text bindings to YAML and validated them individually using 
> >> following commands
> >>
> >> $ make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> >> $ make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> >>
> >> changelogs are available in respective patches.
> >>
> >> As Sam suggested I'm sending the PWM binding as it is in this patch 
> >> series, clean up patch
> >> will be sent as separate patch.
> > Please give discussion on the previous version some time to complete
> > before sending a new one. I've still got questions about the clocks
> > there.
> 
> Could you please give a green signal to proceed with the v5 patch series 
> with the following changes only in PATCH 3/3?

Didn't we just decide on what to do on the v3 thread yesterday?
Go with that.

> +  clocks:
> +    minItems: 3
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: periph_clk
> +      - const: sys_clk
> +      - const: slow_clk
> +      - const: lvds_pll_clk
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Dharma B.
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to