On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 02:43:00AM +0000, dharm...@microchip.com wrote: > On 17/01/24 1:40 am, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > > content is safe > > > > On 16/01/2024 18:03:19+0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 05:07:59PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: > >>> Convert device tree bindings for Atmel's HLCDC PWM controller to YAML > >>> format. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharm...@microchip.com> > >>> --- > >>> changelog > >>> v1 -> v2 > >>> - Remove the explicit copyrights. > >>> - Modify title (not include words like binding/driver). > >>> - Modify description actually describing the hardware and not the driver. > >>> - Remove pinctrl properties which aren't required. > >>> - Drop parent node and it's other sub-device node which are not related > >>> here. > >>> --- > >>> .../bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ > >>> .../bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt | 29 ------------ > >>> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > >>> create mode 100644 > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml > >>> delete mode 100644 > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt > >>> > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml > >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 000000000000..751122309fa9 > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > >> > >> The original file has no license, but was originally written by a > >> free-electrons employee, so the relicensing here is fine. > >> > > > > I confirm relicensing is fine, even assigning the copyright to > > Microchip (note that Bootlin is legally the same entity as > > free-electrons) > Thanks Conor and Alexandre. > I will add the copyrights back in v3.
Just to note, in case you misunderstood my original comment here: What I said had nothing to do with adding a Microchip copyright assignment to the file, but rather about the fact that your patch relicenses the binding from GPL v2 to GPL v2 OR BSD 2 Clause.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
