Add comments explaining the intention behind the test and certain
implementation details related to device lifetime.

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c
index f85dada4de0a9..b5cf46d9f5cf8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ static void drm_action(struct drm_device *drm, void *ptr)
        wake_up_interruptible(&priv->action_wq);
 }
 
+/*
+ * The test verifies that the release action is called automatically when the
+ * device is released.
+ */
 static void drm_test_managed_run_action(struct kunit *test)
 {
        struct managed_test_priv *priv;
@@ -38,6 +42,11 @@ static void drm_test_managed_run_action(struct kunit *test)
        dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
 
+       /*
+        * DRM device can't be embedded in priv, since priv->action_done needs
+        * to remain allocated beyond both parent device and drm_device
+        * lifetime.
+        */
        drm = __drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev, sizeof(*drm), 0, 
DRIVER_MODESET);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, drm);
 
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to