On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 14:19 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > This is consistent with trying to access a filename that not exist > within a directory which is a good analogy here. The main reason for the > change is that it is easy to confuse the error code of EBADF as an > performing an ioctl on an invalid file descriptor (rather than an > unknown object).
Have you verified no userspace relies on this return value? since this technically an ABI change. >From what I can see probably only libdrm tests care. Dave.
