On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, Luben Tuikov <ltuiko...@gmail.com> wrote: > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_print.h b/include/drm/drm_print.h > index a93a387f8a1a15..ce784118e4f762 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_print.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_print.h > @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ void __drm_dev_dbg(struct _ddebug *desc, const struct > device *dev, > > /* Helper for struct drm_device based logging. */ > #define __drm_printk(drm, level, type, fmt, ...) \ > - dev_##level##type((drm)->dev, "[drm] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > + dev_##level##type(drm ? (drm)->dev : NULL, "[drm] " fmt, > ##__VA_ARGS__)
I think that would be an improvement that stands on its own merits. Please also wrap the first drm in parens (drm). > The output would be similar to that if drm->dev were NULL. Yes. I don't know how people will feel about intentionally using drm_err(NULL, ...) all over the place, but that's another matter. ;) BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
