Hi,
On 2023-10-19 12:55, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 09:25:36PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2023-10-17 11:09, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> Rather than call free_job and run_job in same work item have a dedicated
>>> work item for each. This aligns with the design and intended use of work
>>> queues.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Test for DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT before setting
>>> timestamp in free_job() work item (Danilo)
>>> v3:
>>> - Drop forward dec of drm_sched_select_entity (Boris)
>>> - Return in drm_sched_run_job_work if entity NULL (Boris)
>>> v4:
>>> - Replace dequeue with peek and invert logic (Luben)
>>> - Wrap to 100 lines (Luben)
>>> - Update comments for *_queue / *_queue_if_ready functions (Luben)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 287 +++++++++++++++----------
>>> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 8 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> index 273e0fbc4eab..b1b8d9f96da5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> @@ -213,11 +213,12 @@ void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq
>>> *rq,
>>> * drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr - Select an entity which could provide a
>>> job to run
>>> *
>>> * @rq: scheduler run queue to check.
>>> + * @peek: Just find, don't set to current.
>>
>> The "peek" rename is good--thanks!
>>
>>> *
>>> * Try to find a ready entity, returns NULL if none found.
>>> */
>>> static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>> -drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>> +drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool peek)
>>> {
>>> struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>>
>>> @@ -227,8 +228,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>> if (entity) {
>>> list_for_each_entry_continue(entity, &rq->entities, list) {
>>> if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>> - rq->current_entity = entity;
>>> - reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> + if (!peek) {
>>> + rq->current_entity = entity;
>>> + reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> + }
>>> spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>>> return entity;
>>> }
>>> @@ -238,8 +241,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>> list_for_each_entry(entity, &rq->entities, list) {
>>>
>>> if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>> - rq->current_entity = entity;
>>> - reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> + if (!peek) {
>>> + rq->current_entity = entity;
>>> + reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> + }
>>> spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>>> return entity;
>>> }
>>> @@ -257,11 +262,12 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>> * drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo - Select an entity which provides a job
>>> to run
>>> *
>>> * @rq: scheduler run queue to check.
>>> + * @peek: Just find, don't set to current.
>>> *
>>> * Find oldest waiting ready entity, returns NULL if none found.
>>> */
>>> static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>> -drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>> +drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool peek)
>>> {
>>> struct rb_node *rb;
>>>
>>> @@ -271,8 +277,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq
>>> *rq)
>>>
>>> entity = rb_entry(rb, struct drm_sched_entity, rb_tree_node);
>>> if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>> - rq->current_entity = entity;
>>> - reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> + if (!peek) {
>>> + rq->current_entity = entity;
>>> + reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> + }
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> @@ -282,13 +290,98 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq
>>> *rq)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> - * drm_sched_wqueue_enqueue - enqueue scheduler submission
>>> + * drm_sched_run_job_queue - enqueue run-job work
>>
>> Hmm... so this removes the change from patch 1 in this series, and as such
>> obviates patch 1.
>>
>> Do you want to go with "run_job_queue" and the names introduced here?
>>
>
> Yes, I like the run_job_queue name here.
>
>> In this case, we can have that in patch 1 instead, and this patch
>> would only split the "free job" into its own work item.
>>
>
> Sure, so s/drm_sched_wqueue_enqueue/drm_sched_run_job_queue in patch #1?
Yes. That'll create less thrashing about here and essentialize the changes
this patch is doing here (i.e. minimize the number of changes).
I think "run_job_queue" is a good enough name, and please add lucid comments,
so that it's easy to understand--kinda of like you're telling a story. Thanks!
Generally, patch series shouldn't introduce a change (like in patch #1) which
the same patch series further changes yet again to something else (like in this
patch here). It should change one thing only once.
>
>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> + */
>>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>>> + queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_run_job);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * drm_sched_can_queue -- Can we queue more to the hardware?
>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> + *
>>> + * Return true if we can push more jobs to the hw, otherwise false.
>>> + */
>>> +static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> +{
>>> + return atomic_read(&sched->hw_rq_count) <
>>> + sched->hw_submission_limit;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * drm_sched_select_entity - Select next entity to process
>>> + *
>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> + * @peek: Just find, don't set to current.
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns the entity to process or NULL if none are found.
>>> + */
>>> +static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>> +drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, bool peek)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + if (!drm_sched_can_queue(sched))
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + if (sched->single_entity) {
>>> + if (!READ_ONCE(sched->single_entity->stopped) &&
>>> + drm_sched_entity_is_ready(sched->single_entity))
>>> + return sched->single_entity;
>>> +
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Kernel run queue has higher priority than normal run queue*/
>>> + for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT - 1; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN;
>>> i--) {
>>> + entity = sched->sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO ?
>>> + drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(&sched->sched_rq[i],
>>> peek) :
>>> + drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(&sched->sched_rq[i],
>>> peek);
>>> + if (entity)
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return entity;
>>> +}
>>
>> Can you shed some light on why you need the "peek" capability, i.e. to just
>> see the entity without actually arming it?
>>
>> In a single-entity scheduling, surely peeking at the single entity of
>> a scheduler, can be done easier.
>>
>> I'm asking as none of these functions were intended as a peek-only/-capable
>> solution, and if you need it, this shows that the infrastructure lacks
>> something which you need.
>>
>> It's not designed for "peek", as you can see above: it gets passed-through
>> the function stack until it reaches core functionality to be used in logic.
>>
>> (It just makes the code too complicated with too many special cases, "if's"
>> and if we keep doing this, it would become very hard to understand,
>> maintain, and contribute to in a few years.)
>>
>
> This question made me realize that the callers of this function inverted
> the peek arguments. Will fix in next rev.
>
> The peek is need for drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready which checks if a
> job is ready before queuing the job run worker. This is called from the
> free job worker (hw submission count decrement makes a new job ready) or
> from the run job worker (another job in queue).
Yes, we kind of want "queue if ready" to be "atomic", instead of thrashing
about like,
if run_if_ready(peek),
j = run_if_ready(!peek),
run_job(j).
to become
j = run_if_ready(void).
if (j) run_job(j).
> If we want to blindly queue the job in these cases then this can be
> removed.
Yes, it's what we're doing now.
> Or alternatively we could remove the peek argument and blindly reinit
> the idle when selecting entity. I think this fine if I am reading the
> code correctly. If you agree, I'd lean towards this option.
Yes please--it's what we have now, so no need to change it. select_entity()
really just gives back the entity whose jobs we can (should) run next.
So, yes, let's leave it as is, without a "peek". Thanks!
>
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready - enqueue run-job work if ready
>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> + */
>>
>> "if ready" here makes perfect sense, but in the "free job" case,
>> it should be "if done". See below.
>>
>
> Yes, agree that if done for job makes more sense.
>
>>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
>>> *sched)
>>> +{
>>> + if (drm_sched_select_entity(sched, false))
>>> + drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_queue - enqueue free-job work
>>> * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> */
>>> -static void drm_sched_wqueue_enqueue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> {
>>> if (!READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>>> - queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_submit);
>>> + queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_free_job);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready - enqueue free-job work if ready
>>
>> This should be "if done". Please change this to "if done".
>>
>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> + */
>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
>>> *sched)
>>
>> This should be "if_done". Please change this to "if_done".
>>
>> A "job" is _done_ when it's on the pending list and its fence has been
>> signalled,
>> and we free a job only when it's done, not "ready".
>>
>
> Agree on all of this.
Great! :-)
Regards,
Luben
>
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_sched_job *job;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock);
>>> + job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
>>> + struct drm_sched_job, list);
>>> + if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished))
>>> + drm_sched_free_job_queue(sched);
>>> + spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -310,7 +403,7 @@ static void drm_sched_job_done(struct drm_sched_job
>>> *s_job, int result)
>>> dma_fence_get(&s_fence->finished);
>>> drm_sched_fence_finished(s_fence, result);
>>> dma_fence_put(&s_fence->finished);
>>> - drm_sched_wqueue_enqueue(sched);
>>> + drm_sched_free_job_queue(sched);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -576,7 +669,7 @@ void drm_sched_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>> bool full_recovery)
>>> drm_sched_job_done(s_job, fence->error);
>>> else if (r)
>>> DRM_DEV_ERROR(sched->dev, "fence add callback
>>> failed (%d)\n",
>>> - r);
>>> + r);
>>> } else
>>> drm_sched_job_done(s_job, -ECANCELED);
>>> }
>>> @@ -885,18 +978,6 @@ void drm_sched_job_cleanup(struct drm_sched_job *job)
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_cleanup);
>>>
>>> -/**
>>> - * drm_sched_can_queue -- Can we queue more to the hardware?
>>> - * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> - *
>>> - * Return true if we can push more jobs to the hw, otherwise false.
>>> - */
>>> -static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> -{
>>> - return atomic_read(&sched->hw_rq_count) <
>>> - sched->hw_submission_limit;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /**
>>> * drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue - Wake up the scheduler
>>> * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> @@ -906,43 +987,7 @@ static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct
>>> drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> void drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> {
>>> if (drm_sched_can_queue(sched))
>>> - drm_sched_wqueue_enqueue(sched);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -/**
>>> - * drm_sched_select_entity - Select next entity to process
>>> - *
>>> - * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> - *
>>> - * Returns the entity to process or NULL if none are found.
>>> - */
>>> -static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>> -drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> -{
>>> - struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>> - int i;
>>> -
>>> - if (!drm_sched_can_queue(sched))
>>> - return NULL;
>>> -
>>> - if (sched->single_entity) {
>>> - if (!READ_ONCE(sched->single_entity->stopped) &&
>>> - drm_sched_entity_is_ready(sched->single_entity))
>>> - return sched->single_entity;
>>> -
>>> - return NULL;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* Kernel run queue has higher priority than normal run queue*/
>>> - for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT - 1; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN;
>>> i--) {
>>> - entity = sched->sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO ?
>>> - drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(&sched->sched_rq[i]) :
>>> - drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(&sched->sched_rq[i]);
>>> - if (entity)
>>> - break;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - return entity;
>>> + drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -974,8 +1019,10 @@ drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
>>> *sched)
>>> typeof(*next), list);
>>>
>>> if (next) {
>>> - next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp =
>>> - dma_fence_timestamp(&job->s_fence->finished);
>>> + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
>>> + &next->s_fence->scheduled.flags))
>>> + next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp =
>>> +
>>> dma_fence_timestamp(&job->s_fence->finished);
>>> /* start TO timer for next job */
>>> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>> }
>>> @@ -1025,74 +1072,83 @@ drm_sched_pick_best(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
>>> **sched_list,
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_pick_best);
>>>
>>> /**
>>> - * drm_sched_main - main scheduler thread
>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_work - worker to call free_job
>>> *
>>> - * @param: scheduler instance
>>> + * @w: free job work
>>> */
>>> -static void drm_sched_main(struct work_struct *w)
>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_work(struct work_struct *w)
>>> {
>>> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched =
>>> - container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_submit);
>>> - struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>> + container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_free_job);
>>> struct drm_sched_job *cleanup_job;
>>> - int r;
>>>
>>> if (READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>>> return;
>>>
>>> cleanup_job = drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(sched);
>>> - entity = drm_sched_select_entity(sched);
>>> -
>>> - if (!entity && !cleanup_job)
>>> - return; /* No more work */
>>> -
>>> - if (cleanup_job)
>>> + if (cleanup_job) {
>>> sched->ops->free_job(cleanup_job);
>>>
>>> - if (entity) {
>>> - struct dma_fence *fence;
>>> - struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence;
>>> - struct drm_sched_job *sched_job;
>>> -
>>> - sched_job = drm_sched_entity_pop_job(entity);
>>> - if (!sched_job) {
>>> - complete_all(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> - if (!cleanup_job)
>>> - return; /* No more work */
>>> - goto again;
>>> - }
>>> + drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready(sched);
>>> + drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(sched);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>>
>>> - s_fence = sched_job->s_fence;
>>> +/**
>>> + * drm_sched_run_job_work - worker to call run_job
>>> + *
>>> + * @w: run job work
>>> + */
>>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_work(struct work_struct *w)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched =
>>> + container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_run_job);
>>> + struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>> + struct dma_fence *fence;
>>> + struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence;
>>> + struct drm_sched_job *sched_job;
>>> + int r;
>>>
>>> - atomic_inc(&sched->hw_rq_count);
>>> - drm_sched_job_begin(sched_job);
>>> + if (READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + entity = drm_sched_select_entity(sched, true);
>>> + if (!entity)
>>> + return;
>>>
>>> - trace_drm_run_job(sched_job, entity);
>>> - fence = sched->ops->run_job(sched_job);
>>> + sched_job = drm_sched_entity_pop_job(entity);
>>> + if (!sched_job) {
>>> complete_all(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> - drm_sched_fence_scheduled(s_fence, fence);
>>> + return; /* No more work */
>>> + }
>>>
>>> - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) {
>>> - /* Drop for original kref_init of the fence */
>>> - dma_fence_put(fence);
>>> + s_fence = sched_job->s_fence;
>>>
>>> - r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &sched_job->cb,
>>> - drm_sched_job_done_cb);
>>> - if (r == -ENOENT)
>>> - drm_sched_job_done(sched_job, fence->error);
>>> - else if (r)
>>> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(sched->dev, "fence add callback
>>> failed (%d)\n",
>>> - r);
>>> - } else {
>>> - drm_sched_job_done(sched_job, IS_ERR(fence) ?
>>> - PTR_ERR(fence) : 0);
>>> - }
>>> + atomic_inc(&sched->hw_rq_count);
>>> + drm_sched_job_begin(sched_job);
>>>
>>> - wake_up(&sched->job_scheduled);
>>> + trace_drm_run_job(sched_job, entity);
>>> + fence = sched->ops->run_job(sched_job);
>>> + complete_all(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> + drm_sched_fence_scheduled(s_fence, fence);
>>> +
>>> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) {
>>> + /* Drop for original kref_init of the fence */
>>> + dma_fence_put(fence);
>>> +
>>> + r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &sched_job->cb,
>>> + drm_sched_job_done_cb);
>>> + if (r == -ENOENT)
>>> + drm_sched_job_done(sched_job, fence->error);
>>> + else if (r)
>>> + DRM_DEV_ERROR(sched->dev, "fence add callback failed
>>> (%d)\n", r);
>>> + } else {
>>> + drm_sched_job_done(sched_job, IS_ERR(fence) ?
>>> + PTR_ERR(fence) : 0);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -again:
>>> - drm_sched_wqueue_enqueue(sched);
>>> + wake_up(&sched->job_scheduled);
>>> + drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(sched);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -1159,7 +1215,8 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>> spin_lock_init(&sched->job_list_lock);
>>> atomic_set(&sched->hw_rq_count, 0);
>>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sched->work_tdr, drm_sched_job_timedout);
>>> - INIT_WORK(&sched->work_submit, drm_sched_main);
>>> + INIT_WORK(&sched->work_run_job, drm_sched_run_job_work);
>>> + INIT_WORK(&sched->work_free_job, drm_sched_free_job_work);
>>> atomic_set(&sched->_score, 0);
>>> atomic64_set(&sched->job_id_count, 0);
>>> sched->pause_submit = false;
>>> @@ -1282,7 +1339,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_wqueue_ready);
>>> void drm_sched_wqueue_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> {
>>> WRITE_ONCE(sched->pause_submit, true);
>>> - cancel_work_sync(&sched->work_submit);
>>> + cancel_work_sync(&sched->work_run_job);
>>> + cancel_work_sync(&sched->work_free_job);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_wqueue_stop);
>>>
>>> @@ -1294,6 +1352,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_wqueue_stop);
>>> void drm_sched_wqueue_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> {
>>> WRITE_ONCE(sched->pause_submit, false);
>>> - queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_submit);
>>> + queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_run_job);
>>> + queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_free_job);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_wqueue_start);
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> index e67b53c3546b..625ffe040de3 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> @@ -487,9 +487,10 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
>>> * finished.
>>> * @hw_rq_count: the number of jobs currently in the hardware queue.
>>> * @job_id_count: used to assign unique id to the each job.
>>> - * @submit_wq: workqueue used to queue @work_submit
>>> + * @submit_wq: workqueue used to queue @work_run_job and @work_free_job
>>> * @timeout_wq: workqueue used to queue @work_tdr
>>> - * @work_submit: schedules jobs and cleans up entities
>>> + * @work_run_job: schedules jobs
>>
>> Perhaps a more descriptive explanation could be had,
>>
>> @work_run_job: work which calls run_job op of each scheduler.
>>
>
> Got it.
>
>>> + * @work_free_job: cleans up jobs
>>> * @work_tdr: schedules a delayed call to @drm_sched_job_timedout after the
>>> * timeout interval is over.
>>> * @pending_list: the list of jobs which are currently in the job queue.
>>> @@ -519,7 +520,8 @@ struct drm_gpu_scheduler {
>>> atomic64_t job_id_count;
>>> struct workqueue_struct *submit_wq;
>>> struct workqueue_struct *timeout_wq;
>>> - struct work_struct work_submit;
>>> + struct work_struct work_run_job;
>>> + struct work_struct work_free_job;
>>> struct delayed_work work_tdr;
>>> struct list_head pending_list;
>>> spinlock_t job_list_lock;
>>
>> --
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Matt
>
>> Regards,
>> Luben
>>
