On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 02:30:55PM +0200, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> No-no, sorry for possible confusion. Let me explain again:
>
> 1. we had an issue with i915, which was introduced by 0b62af28f249, and later
> was fixed by 863a8eb3f270
> 2. now I've discovered another issue, which looks very similar to 1., but in
> a VM with Cirrus VGA, and it happens even while having 863a8eb3f270 applied
> 3. I've tried reverting 3291e09a4638, after which I cannot reproduce the
> issue with Cirrus VGA, but clearly there was no fix for it discussed
>
> IOW, 863a8eb3f270 is the fix for 0b62af28f249, but not for 3291e09a4638. It
> looks like 3291e09a4638 requires a separate fix.
Thank you! Sorry about the misunderstanding. Try this:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
index 6129b89bb366..44a948b80ee1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ struct page **drm_gem_get_pages(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
struct page **pages;
struct folio *folio;
struct folio_batch fbatch;
- int i, j, npages;
+ long i, j, npages;
if (WARN_ON(!obj->filp))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
@@ -564,11 +564,13 @@ struct page **drm_gem_get_pages(struct drm_gem_object
*obj)
i = 0;
while (i < npages) {
+ long nr;
folio = shmem_read_folio_gfp(mapping, i,
mapping_gfp_mask(mapping));
if (IS_ERR(folio))
goto fail;
- for (j = 0; j < folio_nr_pages(folio); j++, i++)
+ nr = min(npages - i, folio_nr_pages(folio));
+ for (j = 0; j < nr; j++, i++)
pages[i] = folio_file_page(folio, i);
/* Make sure shmem keeps __GFP_DMA32 allocated pages in the
