Hi Jani
On 9/12/2023 5:16 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 07 Sep 2023, Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org> wrote:
Quoting Jani Nikula (2023-09-01 07:20:34)
The DP CTS test for EDID last block checksum expects the checksum for
the last block, invalid or not. Skip the validity check.
For the most part (*), the EDIDs returned by drm_get_edid() will be
valid anyway, and there's the CTS workaround to get the checksum for
completely invalid EDIDs. See commit 7948fe12d47a ("drm/msm/dp: return
correct edid checksum after corrupted edid checksum read").
This lets us remove one user of drm_edid_block_valid() with hopes the
function can be removed altogether in the future.
(*) drm_get_edid() ignores checksum errors on CTA extensions.
Cc: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhin...@quicinc.com>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
Cc: Kuogee Hsieh <khs...@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suij...@somainline.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <s...@poorly.run>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-arm-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: freedr...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org>
Thanks; is that enough to merge? I can't claim I would have been able to
test this.
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhin...@quicinc.com>
Change looks fine.
We can pick this up in the MSM tree if you would like.
Dmitry, you can please pick this up along with my R-b and Kuogee's R-b
as well.
I think his R-b got misformatted. I can ask him to add that again.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
index 42d52510ffd4..86a8e06c7a60 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
@@ -289,26 +289,9 @@ int dp_panel_get_modes(struct dp_panel *dp_panel,
static u8 dp_panel_get_edid_checksum(struct edid *edid)
It would be nice to make 'edid' const here in another patch.
Sure.
BR,
Jani.
